Good to know it's still not nearly good enough for modern games. Looks like AMD is the way to go in this case. (Now where is their Rx M300 series...)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Broadwell HD Graphics 5500: Windows 8.1 vs. Linux
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GreatEmerald View PostGood to know it's still not nearly good enough for modern games.
As always for gaming, dedicated chips clocked high with their own faster memory and bus width low enough to not eat battery on laptops... are the way to go .
Yeah and good driver, i always forget thatLast edited by dungeon; 24 January 2015, 05:19 PM.
Comment
-
??
Originally posted by dungeon View PostAnd never will be with that kind of bandwidth, look at openarena bench - it sits where it is , even if manufacturing process is 2 nm that can't help... Only Iris might do something, i don't know how much bandwidth is better with those might be up to 60% or something.
As always for gaming, dedicated chips clocked high with their own faster memory and bus width low enough to not eat battery on laptops... are the way to go .
Yeah and good driver, i always forget that
Comment
-
Originally posted by rikkinho View Postdon forget the ddrm4 will resolve this bandwich problem, and dont fogert the intel iris hd, they are the best igpu out there
Intel Iris Pro is Mid-2015 and AMD Carrizo too
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostYeah, that makes sense. In that case I agree with dungeon about 1366x768
I still think benches should be run on aspect ratios that make sense for the screens people have.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Xaero_Vincent View PostYep this pretty much solidifies that APUs still badly suck compared to mid-range or better discrete cards and the near $1900 Michael paid for this laptop (w/ tax) was way too much.
Comment
Comment