Originally posted by emblemparade
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Microsoft Announces... Windows 10 With A Start Menu
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by KivadaYou have that wrong, the reason it's fallen behind is because of all of the anti ubuntu fucktards in the OSS community that forget that they don't have to use Ubuntu, but that the OSS community needs a strong dictator to provide a vision for a completed project instead of the death by a thousand failed forks we now have.
IMO, the reason that Ubuntu has fallen behind is Canonical spreading itself thin with developing Unity and Mir. Unity is understandable, as they have a vision of one shell servicing a number of form factors. Mir is a lot less explicable. It certainly was not about the impossibilities in Wayland.
Only thing I can think of was a desire to be first to market with a modern display system with favorable licensing (CLA) to Canonical. If Mir had been first and widespread, Canonical could have setup a lucrative side business selling licensing exceptions. Alas, that backfired, because whiping up a sturdy and usable display system takes time and effort and Wayland was much further along.
Canonical could have helped with Wayland to get it up to speed earlier, and use that for Unity's underpinnings. They didn't. Now they have their own display system and Unity next that can finally service phones and tablets, but the desktop has been pretty stagnant on Unity 7 for a few release cycles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by r_a_trip View PostThis seems to heavily contradict itself. First you claim no one needs to use Ubuntu, but then you turn around and rail against the number of non-Ubuntu distro's (calling them a failure to boot). So what is it? Do we all need to follow the Glorious Leader? Or are we free to use what works for us? (Where us signifies people not on Ubuntu.)
IMO, the reason that Ubuntu has fallen behind is Canonical spreading itself thin with developing Unity and Mir. Unity is understandable, as they have a vision of one shell servicing a number of form factors. Mir is a lot less explicable. It certainly was not about the impossibilities in Wayland.
Only thing I can think of was a desire to be first to market with a modern display system with favorable licensing (CLA) to Canonical. If Mir had been first and widespread, Canonical could have setup a lucrative side business selling licensing exceptions. Alas, that backfired, because whiping up a sturdy and usable display system takes time and effort and Wayland was much further along.
Canonical could have helped with Wayland to get it up to speed earlier, and use that for Unity's underpinnings. They didn't. Now they have their own display system and Unity next that can finally service phones and tablets, but the desktop has been pretty stagnant on Unity 7 for a few release cycles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KivadaYou have that wrong, the reason it's fallen behind is because of all of the anti ubuntu fucktards in the OSS community that forget that they don't have to use Ubuntu, but that the OSS community needs a strong dictator to provide a vision for a completed project instead of the death by a thousand failed forks we now have.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kivada View PostThe point is the OSS community is overrun with idiots that do absolutely nothing but waste time with duplicated effort instead of backing a project that has legs and could allow Linux to further expand in influence and capability. Where we are now is where we should have been a decade ago.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bison View PostEleven. Exactly. One louder.
Oh by the way, those icons are just there to look good, you never want to actually click on them.
Comment
Comment