Originally posted by Pawlerson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CD-Sized Image Of BSD-Based TrueOS Released For Servers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jake_lesser,pawlerson,endman View Postkpedersen (true name:Karsten Pedersen) is a regular participant in BSD activities (http://dk.linkedin.com/in/karstenlangpedersen).
My blog however is just as relevant to BSD: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/c.../blogs/karstenLast edited by kpedersen; 14 September 2014, 07:43 AM.
Comment
-
What delightful words from some delightful young men.
Originally posted by jake_lesser View Posthttp://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/20...sage-dwindles/
@pawlerson
kpedersen (true name:Karsten Pedersen) is a regular participant in BSD activities (http://dk.linkedin.com/in/karstenlangpedersen). He's a hardcore member of the BSD troll club. So there's no hope to talk sense into him.
ZFS is not advance, it is significantly better compared to stone UFS and UFS2 and a little better compared to ext2. But compared to BTRFS and EXT4. ZFS is a piece of shit, slow, needs more then 4GB of RAM, corruptible, an scalable, can't complete with embedded devices. Plus ZFS is not a F(ail)BSD advantage. Linus now has it and it works far better on Linux then F(ail)BSD.
Also, UFS2 is a total piece of shit even with soft updates and journalling. It's journelling is nothing to shit compared to EXT4FS.
BSD always steal shit. Remember USL vs BSDI? The stupid BSD fucks at Berkeley thought they could get away with violating USL copyright so they got smashed in the ass at court. UC California then disbanded them due to this blatant academic misconduct causing BSD to become the fragmented mess it is today.
Woe!! Opera is dropping FreeBSD. last time I hear is FreeBSD users mostly use opera. I wonder what will happen now.
No, FreeBSD and ZFS are not fantastic project. All they produce is shitty performance and usability and contribute to fragmentation in the FLOSS community.
HAHAHA... What a joke, You should see Hammer's performance compared to ZFS, BTRFS, EXT4FS and even EXT2FS. Greg K Hartmann even said Matt Dillion shouldn't waste time making his shitty OS like Linux when He could simply make Linus better. BTW. Good luck with porting Hammer2 to OpenBSD. MadDog Dillion has adopted the Linux/Systemd way of making his shit run on his OS only and run it well.
Actually, that is one reason not to use TrueOS no FakeOS. Systemd is vital to modern system administration. Plus, Linux's networking code far out performs BSD's.
Just toys, not serious stuff. Netflix itself is a single company. Compare their 30% to other companies and we got 1 to 5% like my sources claim.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ericg View PostIf its based off FreeBSD then they have a better scaling network stack then Linux does (for now)
Any benchmarks to share?
FWIW we have proprietary software that can handle ~120HD/160FD Gbps. DPDK can reach ~200FD Gbps - both using stock Linux kernels.
Last time we checked FBSD (~8.x) we had issue keeping packet loss to 0 when using multiple ixgbe (10GbE) ports.
- GilboaLast edited by gilboa; 14 September 2014, 11:04 AM.oVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostThis is very funny. The owner of that linked-in seems like an awesome guy. Unfortunately not me. My middle name is Oscar, not Lang and yes, I am half Danish... but not living in Denmark (this is likely where you made a mistake). Your information finding skills amuse me greatly.
My blog however is just as relevant to BSD: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/c.../blogs/karsten
Comment
Comment