Originally posted by Michael_S
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Void Linux Drops Systemd & Switches To LibreSSL
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Michael_S View PostYou have it backwards. pacman uses just one, xbps uses six to do the same thing. I looked, and if people routinely break pacman into pacman-search, pacman-db, pacman-install, etc... I can't find it.
Originally posted by Michael_S View PostSlightly different, per the link MoonMoon provided. Again, why would the developer do something different than chroot just for the sake of being different?
Originally posted by Michael_S View PostAt what point do you draw a line between many dozens of "very very small differences" and two separate projects? I think if we keep enumerating differences and calling them insignificant, soon we can happily declare that XBPS is a blatant ripoff of GCC. Or maybe Firefox.Last edited by cryptoahash; 10 September 2014, 03:17 PM.
Comment
-
Looks very interesting, very interesting.
I've had arch on pretty much everything since about 2008 but I'm in the "systemd went the wrong direction" camp.
I'll look into this further and do want to play with this a bit. Now to find some hardware to convert over...
Brian
Comment
-
its better to install a distro that treats something other than systemd as a first class citizen. arch doesn't do that. i switched a laptop over to void on friday. boot was wicked fast, better than arch before the systemd switch. runit does have a little learning curve but its not too bad. i wish their install was more arch-ish, the current install tool is a bit buggy.Last edited by bnolsen; 14 September 2014, 04:56 PM.
Comment
Comment