Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mozilla Firefox On Wayland Is Progressing
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View PostHe wouldn't accept reality: his skewed view on FOSS would be forever warped by a 25+ year foundation of frameworks dating back to 1989 NeXTSTEP 1.0 which has seen every single OS since blatantly rip it off, however poorly.
That has nothing to do with Apple, it's about Linux - or does MacOSX use Wayland? I don't think so!
Back to topic, that's why I don't want GTK3: http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3...slenvm_jpg.htm
It's ugly, it wastes screen space. Pass.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View PostA bag of hurt known as Qt where every idea needs a button and configuration option. Pass.
Developers building Qt can decide certain option at configuration times, a technique usually referred to as build-options.
Users of applications built with Qt can influence certain features by setting environment variables before launching the application.
Developers creating applications might expose configuration options in their applications' UI, but that is obviously independent of the library being used.
Cheers,
_
Comment
-
Originally posted by J?rnS View PostGTK3 *puke*
I hope they will face the same issues like Audacious and port to Qt. I would prefer even Lynx over a GTK3-Firefox. Gnome team doesn't care about external projects, so I don't care about them!
Comment
-
Originally posted by J?rnS View PostAccept reality, okay - it's an Apple fanboy!
That has nothing to do with Apple, it's about Linux - or does MacOSX use Wayland? I don't think so!
Back to topic, that's why I don't want GTK3: http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3...slenvm_jpg.htm
It's ugly, it wastes screen space. Pass.
Cocoa is at lest used with a platform with a "measurable" market share.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Akka View PostWhy should they port to qt. It is suicide for them to use it in mac and windows environment. The port has only use in linux. And Qt still has very small market share in linux. Maybe Canonical can change that in a few years, but this has still not happened. In a gtk environment qt is able to (somewhat) integrate with a soon deprecated gtk2. Before Canonical release a usable desktop version of unity it is a idiotic project to waste money at.
Cocoa is at lest used with a platform with a "measurable" market share.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Akka View PostWhy should they port to qt. It is suicide for them to use it in mac and windows environment. The port has only use in linux. And Qt still has very small market share in linux. Maybe Canonical can change that in a few years, but this has still not happened. In a gtk environment qt is able to (somewhat) integrate with a soon deprecated gtk2. Before Canonical release a usable desktop version of unity it is a idiotic project to waste money at.
Cocoa is at lest used with a platform with a "measurable" market share.
Even if this is not correct: Qt integrates really good in every desktop, GTK3 does not. CSD, anyone?
Comment
Comment