Originally posted by Maxjen
View Post
In any case, lets not forget that there's CryEngine 3 at around $10/month.
And as for a personal note, I like Unreal Engine and all, but if it's going to continue relying on sub-par performing PhysX, I can't say I'd want anything to do with that. Been plenty of games I missed out on having the best experience with due to PhysX 2 and it's crap single-threaded performance. "oh but you could just buy an NVIDIA GPU and run it on the GPU" nope. As arrogant as it might sound, I'm not going to be a blind follower and support NVIDIA's marketing in that way.
So basically, I'm really hoping CryEngine 3 gets used more than Unreal Engine 4 at this point. If Unreal Engine supports and ships (ships because I can bet most people just trying to chug out a UE4 game(s) aren't going to bother with integrating a separate engine) with a non-biased physics engine though, that would be great.
Comment