Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA Updates Its Linux Legacy Driver For GeForce 6/7 GPUs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Commander View Post
    Mantle is an API that derived from console's but is not the same,
    XboxOne uses DirectX and Direct3D and/or custom to hardware
    PS4 uses from what I know OpenGL and/or custom
    Mantle is a mid-level API specific to a single GPU architecture. It is NOT a low level API, and can not deliver the types of performance gains a low-level API can offer.
    XB1 uses a form of DX11 tailored to the HW/SW stack of the XB1.
    The PS4 uses a form of OpenGL ES as its high level graphics API, but also sports a libgcm library for low-level HW access. For performance, using libgcm is preferred over PSGL.

    So you are starting to create an ecosystem that looks like this:

    Windows: Mantle, OpenGL, or DirectX
    OSX/BSD/Linux: OpenGL
    XB1: DirectX
    PS4: OpenGL ES (PSGL) or libgcm

    NVIDIA: OpenGL or DirectX
    AMD: Mantle, OpenGL, or DirectX

    You are fast getting to the point where we are going to return to the days where different API's/Vendors support different feature sets. Remember the days where Glide offered the highest quality level, DirectX supported lower detail but higher resolutions, and OpenGL had the lowest resolution but advanced graphical features? We're going back to that. And that's not good for the ecosystem as a whole.

    All this goes back to the failure to significantly update OpenGL back in the 2.0 days.

    Comment


    • #22
      It's been a long time since the OGL 2.0 days.

      The root of it is that developers target the consoles and couldn't care less about PC gaming.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by eydee View Post
        First part: I guess contributing to the open source driver is much more than what nvidia does. Nvidia can stop anytime. The open source driver will live on no matter what happens to AMD. This is the real legacy support in my opinion, they place control into the hands of the users.
        The open driver can also fall into a state of unmaintained mode and even dropped from mainline. This has happened with other open drivers. Same pitfall, if someone qualified isn't around or willing to maintain them, then they fall off the bus. Nvidia does support their products well past the point where there are a number of people still using them. That trend has always been the case since nvidia started putting out blobs for *nix.

        Comment


        • #24
          One of my boxes has a GeForce 4 and NVidia some time ago showed me a middle finger.
          Free drivers rulez!

          EDIT: Nouveau lit my 1366x768 monitor with no troubles, in NVidia's prop. driver it was really a hassle to configure.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Mat2 View Post
            One of my boxes has a GeForce 4 and NVidia some time ago showed me a middle finger.
            Free drivers rulez!

            EDIT: Nouveau lit my 1366x768 monitor with no troubles, in NVidia's prop. driver it was really a hassle to configure.
            Since we're sharing anecdotes...

            I too have a box with a Geforce 4. Nouveau does not work well with it, this is the bug I'm hitting: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54587. The blob works great however. I had to install xorg-server-1.12, which is the last version supported by the now end-of-life legacy branch for Geforce 4, but other than that no problems.

            Comment


            • #26
              My impression from this is same old story from AMD. They don't support Linux, open driver or not. Even the binary blob should work since they use Windows code but it's not the first time I read that it's unpredictable in Windows - meaning, it is not sure to work. I have read of Windows users complain about driver support regarding AMD. You expect Linux drivers to be good?

              So, you cannot even use the binary drivers which should at least give full functionality of the card and decent performance. Yet, it's supposedly more buggy than open drivers?

              If your choice is between open and okay performance but many lacking features and often bugs vs fglrx (just a mess?) which is not reliable, then it stands to reason that people will take nvidia since they invest a bit more even though they don't offer a decent free driver (and let the community support that). It's a shame but some ppl just want their cards to work without much trouble.

              Maybe I'll get an AMD card for fun/kicks some day but from reading here, it sounds like it's a headache and probably many features not working or displaying bugs.

              Comment

              Working...
              X