Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Qualcomm Retracts Its Massive DMCA Takedown Of Git Repositories

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deimios View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong (not from the US) but doesn't the DMCA takedown request have the line: you declare UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?

    Doesn't this mean some steep fines for false takedown requests?
    But they didn't break this. They are the copyright owner and are authorized to act. Just that their act was unnecessary and caused loss to other parties. Hopefully that is covered by some other clause there. But not this one.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    27

    Default If there are no fines ...

    Quote Originally Posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    but someone would need to sue them.
    ... can we just issue a DMCA notice for the Microsoft website? Just for fun? And take it back after a week or so, saying "Sorry, was a mistake...".

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lowflyer View Post
    ... can we just issue a DMCA notice for the Microsoft website? Just for fun? And take it back after a week or so, saying "Sorry, was a mistake...".
    Sure, go ahead... but only if you don't mind having several dozen $5000/hour lawyers knocking on your door 10 minutes later...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    27

    Default

    @droidhacker: Do you imply that Qualcomm has now several dozens of $5000/hour lawyers knocking at their door? If this is the case, then I be able to sleep a lot better tonight (with a happy grin on my face...)

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dragorth View Post
    And apparently he/she has enough authority to do some good.
    I doubt it has got anything to do with authority. Anyone who is a bit smarter will automatically stand out as the authority over the rest.

    Rather someone must have paid attention and taken an interest to what his or her minions are actually doing, which does not happen automatically. Authorities will often not care unless some alarms go off.

    It could well be that we have to thank the press for it.
    Last edited by sdack; 07-08-2014 at 01:31 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdack View Post
    This proves one thing... among all them Qualcomm employees there is at least one who is not quite as stupid as the rest.
    Or someone at Sony Mobile said:
    "What the fsck was that? Get you shit together or we will never consider your hardware, and sue you for the damage in cost and reputation when you accuse us of copyright infringement and take down our source repositories!"

    Sony is not a small player, and I do not think Qualcomm wants to piss them off more then necessary.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Qualcomm Retracts Its Massive DMCA Takedown Of Git Repositories

    As a follow-up to the story about a Qualcomm DMCA notice taking down 100+ repositories of open-source code on GitHub, Qualcomm has changed course...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTczNzA
    One of the worst news in reality...

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Outthere, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jammyamerica View Post
    One of the worst news in reality...
    So, taking back the take down notice based on unfounded illegal activity is in fact the worst new ever.

    I'd like a shrubbery. A nice one.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deimios View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong (not from the US) but doesn't the DMCA takedown request have the line: you declare UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?

    Doesn't this mean some steep fines for false takedown requests?
    It's a penalty that exists in theory, but one that's virtually impossible to enact in practice because you would have to prove that they knowingly filed a false takedown request.

    In other words, you need a smoking gun email where their CEO's are talking about how great it will be to send these illegal takedowns out the next day even though they know they are completely false.

    Without that, they can just claim some automated system flagged it, or an employee mistakenly thought they should send these out, and legally they are in the clear.

    Good luck getting anywhere with that, unless you've got millions of dollars to launch a full scale investigation and years-long legal attack.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10

    Default

    And apparently he/she has enough authority to do some good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •