Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: PulseAudio 5.0 Supports BlueZ 5, Native Log Target For Systemd

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,133

    Default PulseAudio 5.0 Supports BlueZ 5, Native Log Target For Systemd

    Phoronix: PulseAudio 5.0 Supports BlueZ 5, Native Log Target For Systemd

    The latest version of the widely-used PulseAudio sound server is now available. With PulseAudio 5.0 comes new end-user features...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYxOTg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL 32304
    Posts
    113

    Default

    I really don't have a need for PulseAudio. All I have is JACK and an ALSA Loopback interface for ALSA-applications that connects through JACK and through my sound card.

    The problem with PulseAudio is it takes up CPU resources that it does not need.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    And I have a need for PulseAudio. Different people have different needs, who knew!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL 32304
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Yeah, that's true. I wonder who use Bluetooth devices with their computers? Desktop computers?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraysonPeddie View Post
    Yeah, that's true. I wonder who use Bluetooth devices with their computers? Desktop computers?
    I do.. I have bluetooth headphones with a microphone. I sometimes also stream audio via. bluetooth from my Nexus 7 to my desktop computer. Again.. it mainly is just "pair, enable and play" with Pulseaudio.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Key West, FL
    Posts
    7

    Default Bluetooth Speakers

    I use bluetooth between my laptop, my smartphone, and my speakers so that I can move between my table and bed in my studio apartment. I don't currently have a desktop. If I had an HTPC, I could see a use for it with that as well given my current speakers setup.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraysonPeddie View Post
    Yeah, that's true. I wonder who use Bluetooth devices with their computers? Desktop computers?
    I have HTPC. Redirecting music from my phone would be nice, and I think all the features are available now so I plan on trying it out soon.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    126

    Default

    too late to edit:

    So would the opposite: playing a movie on the htpc and having the sound directed to headphones connected to my phone.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraysonPeddie View Post
    Yeah, that's true. I wonder who use Bluetooth devices with their computers? Desktop computers?
    I'm a happy user too and I don't use bluetooth devices. I use it to easily switch streams from PC speakers/Headphones to my AV receiver (HDMI).
    This way I can play games on the headphones and someone else watches movies on the TV.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraysonPeddie View Post
    I really don't have a need for PulseAudio. All I have is JACK and an ALSA Loopback interface for ALSA-applications that connects through JACK and through my sound card.

    The problem with PulseAudio is it takes up CPU resources that it does not need.
    The bad thing with computers, is that the percentage of users with a deep understanding of the technology is very small...

    On a modern pc, a cpu sits idle most of the time and wastes electricity doing NOTHING. The cpu resources are there, take up electricity, but do no calculations. Modern cpus have features to shut down some resources, but they cannot eliminate the problem completely.

    Pulseaudio on a modern cpu takes up a really small percentage of cpu power and ram. Really really small. You waste the electricity anyway, and it won't make a difference in your user experience, so why disable it? So you can have a false sense of efficiency?

    Even when using heavy applications or games, a modern cpu does not work 100%. It still has room for Pulseaudio...

    So all these arguments about wasting cpu resources are made by amateurs who just want to appear "smart" and "knowledgable". Fun fact: You cannot impress an engineer with that BS, keep those with your teenager friends...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •