Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: The Latest Distro Trying For Commercial Success Uses Arch & Wayland

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,391

    Default The Latest Distro Trying For Commercial Success Uses Arch & Wayland

    Phoronix: The Latest Distro Trying For Commercial Success Uses Arch & Wayland

    A new Linux distribution under development is among the latest dreaming of commercial success in hopes of finally conquering the Linux desktop and having their OS pre-installed on systems being sold in brick and mortar stores...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTczNTA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    116

    Default

    just.... WHY?!
    the name sucks, mate with a windows like menu really? and arch?
    this al FAIL written all over it...

    Also why should we fount his new DE when we cant trow money at current DE's and make them better instead???

    WDIt just one more thing before i faceplam my head of...

    "Tired of Major and Unneccessary Changes To Your Operating System?
    The Answer: Operating System U"

    WITH ARCH??????
    Last edited by TheSoulz; 07-05-2014 at 09:30 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Not sure if I'm suposed to laugh or cry.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Arch + Wayland + MATE sounds good.
    I would pay for a Linux distribution that can compete with Windows.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheSoulz View Post
    "Tired of Major and Unneccessary Changes To Your Operating System?
    The Answer: Operating System U"

    WITH ARCH??????
    I laughed . A surprising choice indeed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,162

    Default

    Massive respect to Michael for not ending the article with a giant "LOL".

    Yeah, no need to comment on this one.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,441

    Default

    While I personally find Arch overall more user friendly in a maintenance perspective than most distros, I'd say it's harder than average as a whole. Regardless, these people have seriously unrealistic goals who have been using linux too long to not understand the stupidity of the average user.

    Canonical meanwhile has invested millions and employing hundreds of developers and still hasn't completely cracked the Linux desktop.
    That may be true, but to be fair, they made a lot of moves that people weren't happy with. Canonical acted like they were the authority over the linux community and they did things that hardware vendors find difficult to work with. Their end products are, from what I hear, pretty good for newcomers (who at least give it a shot). But, people hate change - if Canonical really wants to attract new users, they're either going to have to have an experience that closely resembles Windows or they're going to have to run ANY Windows program they want, both of which are incredibly stupid things but that's how you attract the herd. But, the problem is if something LOOKS like windows but doesn't run Windows programs, that changes people's expectations and therefore causes disappointment. This is why Windows RT failed - it looked like Windows, it was called Windows, but it couldn't run x86 programs. So in this perspective, an unfamiliar interface is the best thing to do. It's just a matter of how you prioritize familiarity.
    Last edited by schmidtbag; 07-05-2014 at 10:42 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Their naming sense sucks, and as such they will never, ever get that commercial success unless they rename it (there a lot of good names out there, Zorin OS for example, whoever thought of that had a great naming sense!)

    I'm all for their choice of Arch + Wayland + MATE, but I personally think they would be a lot better off going with Arch + Wayland + Enlightenment, then modifying enlightenment a lot (fork it) why? because with enlightenment they can set up a default theme, but it is extremely themable either way so it is easy to offer out of the box user friendliness with it, a really sleek look and unlimited customization possibilities for those who don't like the default. But Mint most certainly would have been choice #2 in my book.

    Still, I have little hope for this project succeeding, especially when HP has a new open source OS just around the corner that is much more likely to come served pre-installed on machines than any linux distribution (as it is sponsored by a colossal company, i.e. hp)

  9. #9

    Default Funny

    Did someone else notice their "CEO" is 17 years old.

    You can check out his hilarious bio on their website - http://www.operatingsystemu.com/#!an...rnstein-/c17v3

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael
    Operating System U is to be based off Arch Linux, run a modified version of the MATE Desktop Environment, and will use Wayland in place of the X.Org Server. Operating System U also plans to modify the MATE Desktop to make it better while also developing a new component they call Startlight, which pairs the Windows Start Button with Apple's Spotlight.
    Right. And suddenly, MATE (and GTK2) supports Wayland by magic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •