Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Running The Linux 3.16 Kernel Might Be A Bit Slower On An Ultrabook

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,357

    Default Running The Linux 3.16 Kernel Might Be A Bit Slower On An Ultrabook

    Phoronix: Running The Linux 3.16 Kernel Might Be A Bit Slower On An Ultrabook

    For those running an Intel ultrabook, here's some benchmarks using the Linux 3.16 kernel on this portable x86 hardware compared to Linux 3.15. Unfortunately, the results aren't too promising...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcyOTQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Does the performance drop have anything to do with the new power management features in the scheduler? If so, check out how the battery life is changed under normal workloads. A minor change in performance is certainly worth it for a laptop on battery power, though not for one plugged into the wall.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    519

    Default

    That performance drop is so minor and statistically insignificant, I can't see any end user losing sleep over it and skipping a kernel upgrade unless they are just being pedantic.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    21

    Default

    cpu frequency in 3.16 is way up if idle, backlight keys on my T440p don't work anymore and system won't enter lower package states even if display is completely off. idle drain is now 19 watts from my battery with powertop --auto-tune. nice job!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saski View Post
    cpu frequency in 3.16 is way up if idle, backlight keys on my T440p don't work anymore and system won't enter lower package states even if display is completely off. idle drain is now 19 watts from my battery with powertop --auto-tune. nice job!
    Are other people affected similarly?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Well, I said this in other thread, but I guess it could be useful here, too. With kernel 3.16-rc2, my system (AMD A6-3400M, iGPU Radeon HD 6520g + dGPU 6750M) feels slow. I don't think it's the disk, though...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1

    Default Not just a bit slower on a Lenovo IdeaPad Y500

    After seeing extremely poor performance with bcache in its infancy, I swapped the HDD to an SSD in my Lenovo IdeaPad Y500, but made a habit of running phoronix-test-suite benchmark pts/disk when upgrading the kernel, just to see how things went.

    Some tests have begun to fail, but the ones that run show pretty grim numbers - especially for 3.16-rc*.

    The results are at http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...SO-Y500DISK045 from 3.12 up to 3.16-rc3.

    I am nowhere sure what is happening, but I seem to experience extreme interaction lag with 3.16-rc*, reminiscent of the bad old days where any sort of heavy disk I/O would semi-freeze any interaction with the desktop.

    One possibility could be bugs in the new block-mq, but I have neither the time nor the kernel insight to verify this.

    Look especially at IOZone, Apache Benchmark and DBench...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •