Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 106

Thread: In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,812

    Default In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2

    Phoronix: In Road To Qt, Audacious Switches From GTK3 Back To GTK2

    The popular Audacious open-source audio player was ported to GNOME's GTK+ 3.x tool-kit, but now developers have decided to move back to their GTK2 user-interface port while ultimately they are planning for a Qt version...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcyODA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Maybe they can revert version number too , 3.x was bumped because of gtk3. .

  3. #3

    Default

    Hooray!!

    I've been using kinda old 3.2.4 so far 'cause I refuse to use anything based on GTK3.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    28

    Default

    funny reading this. Until now, I wasn't aware that they wanted to port to Qt. Going back to gtk2 for stability makes some sense, as gtk2 is as stable as it's going to get!
    I've been a long time audacious user but recently switched away from it, preferring qt programs with my kde desktop.
    Until audacious makes 'the right' switch toolkit-wise, I guess it wouldn't be wrong to link to http://qmmp.ylsoftware.com/.
    Qmmp is like audacious, at least it support the classic winamp interface styles and does what it says on the box - play music!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bulgaria for now
    Posts
    162

    Default

    I guess it's not that surprising, not everyone wants part of what Gnome is building, but given they switched to Gtk3 in the first place it is slightly confusing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    152

    Default

    well also Lubuntu is moving from Gtk2 to QT by LxQt graphical environment.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    812

    Default

    If you want your stuff to run on windows - Qt is the only reasonable solution.
    For Gtk window$ and mac are just an afterthought, for example, to this day only the ancient gtk2 version of gedit is available for windows.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Writing non-gnome stuff with GTK3 is like eating a cactus.
    "GTK3 was made for GNOME DE, we don't care if it's used anywhere else." -- official position of GNOME devs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    376

    Default

    I can only understand and welcome their choice (even if I donít use Audacious) after having seen the disaster caused by a recent Gtk3 update (no more window borders, broken displayÖ). Not to mention the early problems that still havenít been fixed like the broken scrollbars. It looks like the only sane GUI choice nowadays is QtÖ (which I donít like much, mainly because itís C++Ö but it could be worse).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    524

    Default

    Awesome! Audacious is one of the first apps I used when I switched to Linux 3 years ago, and to this day it is IMO one of the best designed GTK apps out there. When they released their last GTK2 supported version, I stopped upgrading (and am using 3.0.4 to this day) because GTK3 looks plain horrible. Looks like I will finally be able to compile an up to date version again =)

    I'm a bit sad about the switch to Qt because GTK2 is a very good looking toolkit, although I can understand it all the way, as I highly prefer Qt to it when developing my own programs (good cross platform support being just advantage).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •