Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Intel's Compiler Team Is Trying To Land OpenMP In Clang ASAP

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,920

    Default Intel's Compiler Team Is Trying To Land OpenMP In Clang ASAP

    Phoronix: Intel's Compiler Team Is Trying To Land OpenMP In Clang ASAP

    Intel developers in Moscow remain hard at work trying to land OpenMP support within LLVM's Clang C/C++ compiler as soon as possible...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcyNTI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Clang will be much more competitive to GCC on modern multi-core systems in the many scientific applications that take advantage of OpenMP.
    yeah, if you mean that performance in wav 2 mp3, clang is going to rule the universe.
    in other words, no-one is going to bother with that things, slc6.5 and all those who use proper distros, not some ubuntu pozer staff, are going to use openmp and are not going to benefit no matter what that cripple-the-amd-cpus compiler team is going to do.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yorgos View Post
    yeah, if you mean that performance in wav 2 mp3, clang is going to rule the universe.
    in other words, no-one is going to bother with that things, slc6.5 and all those who use proper distros, not some ubuntu pozer staff, are going to use openmp and are not going to benefit no matter what that cripple-the-amd-cpus compiler team is going to do.
    What's wrong with openmp?

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yorgos View Post
    yeah, if you mean that performance in wav 2 mp3, clang is going to rule the universe.
    in other words, no-one is going to bother with that things, slc6.5 and all those who use proper distros, not some ubuntu pozer staff, are going to use openmp and are not going to benefit no matter what that cripple-the-amd-cpus compiler team is going to do.
    Er, what? I couldn't parse any of that.

    I run Ubuntu, and use OpenMP all the time for high performance numerical simulations. Works well, but it'd be nice to try with Clang rather than GCC.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baffledmollusc View Post
    Er, what? I couldn't parse any of that.
    Exactly, it didn't make any sense at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •