Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: 35-Way NVIDIA/AMD Proprietary Linux Graphics Driver Comparison

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brosis View Post
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...OURC58&compare

    Xonotic 1920x1080, Ultimate:
    Model ----------- Open - Proprietary
    Radeon HD 5450 8.43 14.27
    Radeon HD 5770 69.92 88.03
    Radeon HD 5830 94.33 96.56
    Radeon HD 6450 16.50 19.54
    Radeon HD 6570 35.81 47.28
    Radeon HD 6770 69.59 89.56
    Radeon HD 6870 110.96 104.94
    Radeon HD 6950 119.75 122.32

    This is very nice.
    Sad, but nice (think Judd Nelson, Breakfast club)

    Compared to the Nvidia (Linux and Windows) and ATI (Windows) driver performance, these results are sad.

    Compared to prior Radeon open source implementations, they are nice.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Default

    What happened to the GTX 460 results for TF2?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    120

    Default Add some 720p (1k) and some arch to the tests please ot name it phorobuntu

    I have just buy a NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti
    I tested it at 720p (1k)
    in Ubuntu 14.04 default kernel, Half Live Lost Coast test 100 fps
    in Manjaro 3.14 kernel 150 fps

    It was not the same kernel, but I bet the Manjaro kernel settings are faster than Ubuntu ones. In a new Xubuntu it takes seconds to start Chrome and not at all in Manjaro.

    You asked if we would like to see other distros tested and Manjaro had a good share of the votes, and it is a good benchmark for Ubuntu if they are doing something not good enough compared with other distro.

    Last but not least, usually Linux boxes are not state of the art ones, so 720p (1k) game benchmarking that will give twice or more FPS than 1080p (2k) and would make some games playable or fun to play and the video quality is very similar, would be very interesting to read. Soon enough test will be only 4k and it would be better if we can read 1k +2k + 4k test together to watch if the GPU scales well with that test and at what resolution it is playable that game with each card.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deppman View Post
    Sad, but nice (think Judd Nelson, Breakfast club)

    Compared to the Nvidia (Linux and Windows) and ATI (Windows) driver performance, these results are sad.

    Compared to prior Radeon open source implementations, they are nice.
    No. No sadness here.

    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...OURC58&compare

    Nvidia binary is of equal performance M$/LINUX, then
    Xonotic 1920x1080, Ultimate,
    GTX 760 proprietary - 140 fps, 185 minimal price in Europe.
    Radeon HD 6870 (opensource radeon) - 110.96, 124 minimal price in Europe.
    Radeon HD 6870 (catalyst) - 104.94

    Sad is only one thing: Michael does not test the same cards over same tests. Although I understand that some cards might not work with opensource well, he should still test them or set 0 score as N/A.
    But because he issues mostly different tests to compare linux:catalyst/radeon//nvidia/nouveau and omits M$:catalyst/nvidia, the tests are not very good to compare.
    He does huge work, but this is sad.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •