Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: An Ubuntu MATE Desktop Spin Might Still Materialize

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,657

    Default An Ubuntu MATE Desktop Spin Might Still Materialize

    Phoronix: An Ubuntu MATE Desktop Spin Might Still Materialize

    There's been much talk in the past about creating a spin/derivative of Ubuntu Linux using the MATE Desktop Environment fork of GNOME2. While no spin materialized for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, talk of developing a new spin is again happening...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcxMzM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Mubuntu!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    69

    Thumbs up

    This is great news, perhaps all the "Unity is the worst thing ever" people can lay off all the Ubuntu hate now. It's like the old days of Gnome 2.X with updated packages. I do have to admit, it's about time though.

    Personally I tend to mostly use Arch, CentOS & Debian but Ubuntu is definitely the best distro for new full time Linux users switching from Windows / Mac.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,326

    Default

    I automatically associate "spin" with Fedora. I think of different 'buntus as "flavors."
    Am I alone on that one?

  5. #5

    Default

    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enfocomp View Post
    This is great news, perhaps all the "Unity is the worst thing ever" people can lay off all the Ubuntu hate now.
    That won't happen until Unity dies and Ubuntu features some other desktop as default.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    297

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.
    To me, nothing in Linux comes close to the Windows 7 look with a small taskbar and Aero enabled. Obviously Windows Explorer is not the best file manager, but you get used to it.

    If the Gnome guys were willing to listen, we wouldn't have Cinnamon and MATE nowadays. So go and complain to them, because they are all a bunch of tabletoid gnomes.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Israel, Tel-Avil
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.
    I know I am feeding a troll, but I bite.

    If someone is hippie that its you, thinking that something modern automatically means good.
    If your awesome Unity works for you, fine, but I prefer MATE, and thus there is no reason for it to die, as long as there are sufficient amount of people like me.

    And when people say about linux not catching up, they don't mean that we don't have the latest fad in UX/UI design. They mean that Linux has franlky more bugs that win98 ever had.

  9. #9

    Default

    I have tried MATE about one year ago, and I found it a pretty nice desktop, but something I have always wondered, no trolling: is there really anything MATE has that Xfce4 hasn't? I know FOSS is all about choice, but I found them very similar, and Xfce4 a bit more customizable.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.
    MATE doesn't need to die. It has a very functional UI that works for many people. It was created because there was a demand for the old Gnome2 DE. Personally, I don't use any of this shit but if I had a choice between Unity or MATE, I'd choose MATE. Not that I had Unity, but the old GNOME2 worked fine for me. I don't need to impress other users. I just need my OS to work for me. Get it? So all this nonsense about people complaining that Linux is stuck in the past: You need to get off their balls buddy. If a DE works for you, it works. If it doesn't, move on but don't drag others with you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •