Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: The Performance-Per-Watt, Efficiency Of GPUs On Open-Source Drivers

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,527

    Default The Performance-Per-Watt, Efficiency Of GPUs On Open-Source Drivers

    Phoronix: The Performance-Per-Watt, Efficiency Of GPUs On Open-Source Drivers

    To complement the initial results earlier this week of trying 60+ graphics cards on the open-source Linux GPU drivers, here's the second round of our mass open-source graphics driver testing. While in Wednesday's article were the raw OpenGL results for the wide-range of graphics processors on the open-source Intel, Radeon, and Nouveau articles, in today's article are complementary results providing a brief look at the system power consumption, performance-per-Watt, CPU usage, and GPU thermal information when testing the hardware in the same configuration.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=20511

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    361

    Default

    Michale, why do you even bother to include the Radeon R7 260X if you don't want to update the firmware? This is a trivial fix.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14

    Question

    Was radeon.dpm enabled for the modern ATI/AMD cards?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MannerMan View Post
    Was radeon.dpm enabled for the modern ATI/AMD cards?
    dpm won't make much difference when your objective is to test the "full out" performance, since it will automatically scale up to full power.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,081

    Default

    There is a major flaw in this test that was nearly alluded to in the write-up; when the gpu performance goes up, the *whole system* power consumption goes up in order to be able to feed the GPU as much data as it is able to consume. It would be very helpful to be able to test the power consumed *specifically* by the GPU -- which may be possible on discrete units that have their own power plug.

    It is pretty impressive that the best performing GPUs are also able to generate the lowest total system power consumption... though I suspect that if it was testing GPU power consumption specifically, the difference would be even greater.


    Anyhow... AMD FTW!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    dpm won't make much difference when your objective is to test the "full out" performance, since it will automatically scale up to full power.
    True that. Guess idle power-usage would be more interesting with/without DPM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,533

    Default

    Or the cards being on the "battery" profile. Right now the comparison between radeon and nouveau doesn't really make sense, as the former is pretty much on performance, and the latter on powersave...

    The heat graph was pretty interesting, though. I still don't get how the 4890 has lower heat than the 5450...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    250

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MannerMan View Post
    True that. Guess idle power-usage would be more interesting with/without DPM.
    i think that would be why CPU workload was included. however... i MIGHT be interesting to have everything in one graph, like with columns of different thickness overlaying or whatever having different colours like

    ____________________
    ============-----|
    =======--------------|
    ___________________ |

    _______________
    ========-----|
    ====------------|
    ______________ |




    so one can see many results to compare and to see total and relative stuff at once (like fps - thick bar - and CPU usage and power consumption - smaller bars) - while consumton per frame would be the most important.
    it would very much show overhead too. so one could see the relation of these too. throughout the drivers GPUs and maybe different systems too.

    i wanted to to have then overlayed with colours anyway... just a possibility.
    Last edited by jakubo; 06-05-2014 at 02:09 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    dpm won't make much difference when your objective is to test the "full out" performance, since it will automatically scale up to full power.
    Besides, the AMD cards still came out on top in terms of PPW. Speaking of which, I'm actually pretty surprised intel's GPUs are relatively inefficient.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    559

    Default

    Interesting benchmark.

    How about a comparison with the proprietary drivers (probably just to cry a little)?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •