Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 51

Thread: Microsoft Reportedly Releasing A New Skype For Linux Soon

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Anyway, I think I'll try jitsi, at least while waiting for KDE-Telepathy to mature.

    It will give me a truly open way to communicate, even if most people will continue to stone the infidel from their googles.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    53

    Default

    > No organisation in the history of mankind has collected more data than google.

    Why some people talk like if they knew the data that every organisation collects? For example Microsoft could collect more data than Google, and the NSA collects the data from Microsoft, Google and many others, etc.

    > Hangouts is a tool for collecting data about you, just like every Google tool in existence. Claiming that Google does not do data mining is pure comedy.

    Agh, most of proprietary software is a tool for collecting money, and that means collecting data, money from licenses, and whatever. Claiming that companyX is not getting more money because they are not collecting data because someone has paid for the privilege of using it "is pure comedy".

    > Perhaps, but you can use skype with a pseudonym and without selling your browser history.

    I'm curious, which software can sell the browser history of a Firefox user, for example?

    > I hate skype, btw. I wish there were an open alternative that is feasible.

    I share your pain, too :-( We'd be better without abusive data minings from Google, Microsoft and other abusive behaviors like those :-(

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nth_man View Post
    > No organisation in the history of mankind has collected more data than google.

    Why some people talk like if they knew the data that every organisation collects? For example Microsoft could collect more data than Google, and the NSA collects the data from Microsoft, Google and many others, etc.
    http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...n-says-ballmer

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    53

    Default

    That article is "Microsoft now has one million servers less than Google, but more than Amazon, says Ballmer".

    Some people talk like if "says Ballmer" means "it's true". Following the same logic:

    "Theres no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance. Its a $500 subsidized item. They may make a lot of money. But if you actually take a look at the 1.3 billion phones that get sold, Id prefer to have our software in 60% or 70% or 80% of them, than I would to have 2% or 3%, which is what Apple might get."
    http://www.usatoday.com/money/compan...rum-usat_N.htm
    http://brooksreview.net/2011/05/ballmer/

    And, following the same logic, the iPhone is dead and buried. Ballmer said it and Microsoft held an iPhone funeral procession:
    http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/daily...dows_7_par.php
    http://brooksreview.net/2011/05/ballmer/
    http://www.businessinsider.com/micro...al-2010-9?op=1

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nth_man View Post
    And, following the same logic, the iPhone is dead and buried.
    Well, it pretty much is! But not due to any action from ms... ms phones are doing even worse. Android smashed both of them to the ground a long time ago...

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    966

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    No organisation in the history of mankind has collected more data than google.
    MS collected by far more data than google and collects equal amount right now.

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    You need a G+ account, and that requires a real name.
    Wrong, it requires a name, that looks realistic. Their justification is that they don't need any bots misusing the network or socially hacking.

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    Hangouts is a tool for collecting data about you, just like every Google tool in existence. Claiming that Google does not do data mining is pure comedy.
    Hangouts is a strict communication tool, where Skype is a proprietary blackbox network, written by Kazaa guys with huge security history.
    Dedicated hardware skype decryptors were also been available to gov't since ages.

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    Perhaps, but you can use skype with a pseudonym and without selling your browser history. And voice and video are what people use skype for, and those work on everything.]
    Given the history of skype tunneling a copy of local /etc/passwd, this argument is laughable.
    Also, Hangouts is dedicated software only on Android. Its built as plugin for all other platforms, which is much more versatile.
    Skype is in contrast - a dedicated blob, that has full functionality only on windumbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    I hate skype, btw. I wish there were an open alternative that is feasible.
    The major problem is beating network transitions/constant handle. This is why people pay for accounts on SIP servers.
    The day, someone invents Skype-ish feature reduced P2P network, for the sake of stable account handle storing, will be the day when floss VOIP skyrocket.
    Majority of todays open solutions share common problem: difficulty to connect to other member from any country in the world.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Outthere, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brosis View Post
    The major problem is beating network transitions/constant handle. This is why people pay for accounts on SIP servers.
    The day, someone invents Skype-ish feature reduced P2P network, for the sake of stable account handle storing, will be the day when floss VOIP skyrocket.
    Majority of todays open solutions share common problem: difficulty to connect to other member from any country in the world.
    And you will have every telco in the world who supplies data doing everything in their power to stop such software. One tactic is to nurf your data allowance. I remember when there were unlimited plans, and only recently (4 years ago, now).

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee. View Post
    Well, it pretty much is! But not due to any action from ms... ms phones are doing even worse. Android smashed both of them to the ground a long time ago...
    Yeah Apple is really struggling to ship them iPhone now huh

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    835

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottishduck View Post
    Yeah Apple is really struggling to ship them iPhone now huh
    with 13% marketshare according to the IDC and consistently falling, yes yes they are.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UraniumDeer View Post
    Does anyone know of any other P2P VOIP clients? I don't care if its unable to use Skypes network, or unable to call phones.
    There is a perfect alternative: your browser!
    Be it Firefox or Chromium, they are perfectly capable of WebRTC.

    Go there: https://appear.in/
    Pick a name, and video/audio with friends and family works.

    Advantages:
    - If you have a available "route" between the peers in communication, it will use this route. In my case, I was used if with my mother, and the communication went through the VPN I have set myself (with my own private keys). This is obviously one of the only solution that provides you this.
    - Even if you don't have a VPN as in my case, the communication is encrypted by default.
    - Even if you don't have a "common route" (eg both persons are behind NATs with no open ports), the communication will use a "relay". But as it is end-to-end encryption, the relay has no possibility of decrypting the conversations (assuming the are not "evil"!)
    - It is the only solution I saw working on low-specs PC. My mother has a very not-powerful 6 years old Celeron 1G Ram, all the other solutions like Jitsi, Linphone failed to work correctly due to this CPU limitations. My image could be displayed, but displaying at the same time both images was impossible.
    - The quality is very good, does not require a lot of bandwidth (typically 1Mbps for audio+video is enough). It does also adapt to the available bandwidth, as I tested while consuming bandwidth with other operations and it continued to work properly, although with lesser quality.


    What it does NOT do:
    - Availability
    - Signaling (although appear.in added this function if you use Chrome, I have not tested it).

    These 2 items are different features you might want to have (or not!) depending on your use case.
    It is typical features you would find in a communication software, although for POTS (Plain Old Telephony Systems) we never had "Availability" and we managed without it for years!
    POTS has "signaling" on the other hand. It is simply the fact to be able to "ring" your correspondent to let him know you would like to engage in a conversation. There could be also more sophisticated signaling such as warn for a double call.
    This feature obviously requires that the device (Plain Old Telephone in this case) is always listening for the "signaling" of incoming calls.

    If you transpose it, it means that your browser MUST be open at the page of appear.in (or similar site) and be able to notify you (which chrome can do) if some one tries to "call" you.

    So these features : signaling, and the optional "availability", are not 100% fine in todays WebRTC solutions.

    But if you don't mind ring your friends/family with POTS (for the easy "signaling") then switch on WebRTC, the solution is to my point of view the best one.

    Furthermore, used through Firefox, it is almost 100% FOSS (apart from the commencement of the call that occurs at appear.in).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •