Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: AMD Catalyst On Fedora 20 Is Left In An Awkward State

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Stupid question: Why is it accepted these kernel changes are breaking device drivers in the first place?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gamerk2 View Post
    Stupid question: Why is it accepted these kernel changes are breaking device drivers in the first place?
    1. These are proprietary drivers. We don't know what will and what won't break them in the first place. As always, the FOSS drivers work just fine with this latest kernel release ^.^
    2. Even if we DID know what would and would not break them, we wouldn't care. They are a 3rd party, it is not the job of the kernel devs to play nice with proprietary drivers when we have FOSS ones that (mostly) work fine...
    3. AMD has been playing with the idea of using the FOSS kernel-side code, so the proprietary driver would (ideally) never break between kernel releases, along with a ton of other benefits. SOOO looking forward to this

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Hey man,

    Thank you very much for this, it was really helpful.

    [QUOTE=bitwiseoperator;418197]If anyone needs help with this issue, see my blog:

    http://bluehatrecord.wordpress.com/2...h-kernel-3-14/

    /QUOTE]

    I used KDE from 2001 till about 2010 and I might be weird, but I really like gnome-shell. Three things put me off KDE after trying it again (yesterday):
    * The launcher seems so... last decade in style
    * The inability to use the windows key to bring up the launcher is incredibly frustrating. I compiled and installed ksuperwin but it didn't work reliably. I typically launch my apps by hitting windows then typing the name (both for windows and in gnome-shell)
    * The Dolphin file browser also seems really dated and I figured if I had to change that to use nautilus I am probably barking up the wrong tree.

    So I gave cinnamon a go, and wahey, it seems to do what I want (minus the expose by flicking the mouse to the top left corner).

    Don't know if this helps anyone (and sorry if it annoys anyone) but other users might want to try cinnamon if they actually like gnome-shell.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evanjfraser View Post
    I used KDE from 2001 till about 2010 and I might be weird, but I really like gnome-shell. Three things put me off KDE after trying it again (yesterday):
    * The launcher seems so... last decade in style
    For someone claiming to have used KDE software for nine years, you are incredibly inapt to replace one launcher with anotherů

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    For someone claiming to have used KDE software for nine years, you are incredibly inapt to replace one launcher with anotherů
    Dude, I was only trying to be constructive. No need to be a wanker about it. Besides, grammatically speaking, your reply doesn't even make sense.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evanjfraser View Post
    Dude, I was only trying to be constructive.
    You failed. You bashed one thing in order to promote Cinnamon. That's not constructive.

    Quote Originally Posted by evanjfraser View Post
    Besides, grammatically speaking, your reply doesn't even make sense.
    Yeah, now bash the non-native speakerů (If you were constructive, you'd point out the mistake and correct itů)

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    56

    Default

    If you hadn't been so rude in the first place, I wouldn't have dreamed of correcting your grammar.

    I'm sorry I offended you with presenting an infrequently mentioned alternative to KDE, and you're right I could have been more tactful.

    You implied that it was my criticism of the launcher that set you off, I'm not sure why it upset you so much, perhaps you're a developer of it?

    If so, I apologise, and thanks for the hard work in developing KDE.

    If not, then I'm still sorry it upset you, but perhaps you could have responded more tactfully yourself? like: "hey man, did you look at X launcher? I/some like it"

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    For someone claiming to have used KDE software for nine years, you are incredibly inapt to replace one launcher with anotherů
    Or, he can acknowledge that it is not his job to switch DEs around based on what AMD writes. What if he LIKES gnome-shell? I do, and I have been using Redhat (and then Fedora) for 17 years now.

    My solution was to buy NVidia who knows how to code their drivers. I do not like KDE and I will not use something I dont like because AMD is too incompetent to code proper drivers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •