Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: wattOS R8 Is Now Based On Debian Rather Than Ubuntu

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,894

    Default wattOS R8 Is Now Based On Debian Rather Than Ubuntu

    Phoronix: wattOS R8 Is Now Based On Debian Rather Than Ubuntu

    For five years the wattOS Linux distribution has been around as being an energy-efficient distribution powered at its core by Ubuntu, but with their new release they have shifted to being powered by Debian...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTY4NzU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: wattOS R8 Is Now Based On Debian Rather Than Ubuntu

    For five years the wattOS Linux distribution has been around as being an energy-efficient distribution powered at its core by Ubuntu, but with their new release they have shifted to being powered by Debian...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTY4NzU
    Alpine Linux is the most energy-efficient distribution. You can benchmark it and compare with others.
    http://alpinelinux.org/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enihcam View Post
    Alpine Linux is the most energy-efficient distribution. You can benchmark it and compare with others.
    http://alpinelinux.org/
    What about for an ARM machine?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    312

    Default

    This is starting to be a recurring theme. Leaving Ubuntu for Debian.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xeekei View Post
    This is starting to be a recurring theme. Leaving Ubuntu for Debian.
    Not surprising, I hate Ubuntu, and not because it's the popular thing to do.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xeekei View Post
    This is starting to be a recurring theme. Leaving Ubuntu for Debian.
    Which I don't understand why because the Ubuntu base is seriously the easiest and best base you can base your distro off of.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    Which I don't understand why because the Ubuntu base is seriously the easiest and best base you can base your distro off of.
    Perhaps because it tends to break less between releases compared to ubuntu and is building a distro based on debian is quite easy as well.

    I'm wondering if wattOS R8 has any advantage in term of power consumption compared to other lightweight distros, a few years ago Michael tested wattOS R4 against ubuntu 11.04 (http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ttos_vs_ubuntu) and there wasn't really any advantage.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    Which I don't understand why because the Ubuntu base is seriously the easiest and best base you can base your distro off of.
    Would you like to elaborate what exactly is better or easier in Ubuntu compared to Debian when it comes to basing your distro on it?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fedesog View Post
    Perhaps because it tends to break less between releases compared to ubuntu and is building a distro based on debian is quite easy as well.
    Not really. Ubuntu and Debian are very similar, most of the packages are the same. Upgrade breakage is usually caused by apt-get and third party repositories being used, causing dependency problems. I guess you could argue that there are fewer third party repositories supporting Debian so it happens less often, but if Debian had hundreds of PPAs it would be the same. Other most common breakage is Xorg and GPU drivers, and that affects Debian and Ubuntu the same, though there are more Ubuntu desktop users so you do see more reports there. I'm running Jessie - the stable release of Debian wouldn't even boot on my laptop, despite the laptop being 1.5 years old now (problem, unsurprisingly, GPU drivers). Ubuntu at least put some effort into hardware enablement, even 12.04 works.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Would you like to elaborate what exactly is better or easier in Ubuntu compared to Debian when it comes to basing your distro on it?
    Debian don't do hardware enablement for the stable release, so if you want to base off a stable release and have it work on modern hardware you have to do it yourself and ship a different kernel and xorg etc. (like Valve do for Steam OS). Ubuntu based distributions don't have to do that, they can base off an LTS and be confident it will work on new hardware.

    Try installing Ubuntu LTS vs Debian stable on a recent laptop with HiDPI, modern GPU, Broadcom WiFi etc. Neither is a great experience, but Ubuntu is a bit better. And since I know that someone will mention Jessie here - did you know that the installer, right now, does not support touchpads? And that chromium doesn't install? Or that the Gnome display settings does not work (I literally can't configure a monitor without Xrandr). Debian is great but it can be a bit of work sometimes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •