Search:

Type: Posts; User: schmalzler; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.18 seconds.

  1. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Yes, of course. Reading and trying to understand...

    Yes, of course. Reading and trying to understand the C++ standard document needs interpretation. Interpretation makes use of a personal opinion. The more a document lacks concrete advices the more...
  2. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    I don't believe the wordings they use in their...

    I don't believe the wordings they use in their docs. "Extension" imho adds features that are part of the core language definition of other programming languages like properties.i
    Just a quote that...
  3. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    "Bare minimum" in term of rules - again the...

    "Bare minimum" in term of rules - again the standard does not know any tools. And the standard is not a law where you can read what is allowed or disallowed. As I already said: Out of scope means the...
  4. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    "out of scope" means "the standard does not care...

    "out of scope" means "the standard does not care about it" and anything te standard does not care about explicitely is not forbidden, so allowed. The standard doesn't care about code generators, so...
  5. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Yes, they need to be part of the standard,...

    Yes, they need to be part of the standard, because macros, templates etc. are part of the language specification, there needs to be a definition how they need to be handled so that compiler writers...
  6. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    You have to understand that "the c++ standard" is...

    You have to understand that "the c++ standard" is a manual for people "implementing C++" - Those freaks writing GCC/binutils/LLVM/CLANG. The definition of the language is more or less a by-product....
  7. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Not forbidden by the standard = left to...

    Not forbidden by the standard = left to implementers ;) The C++ ISO/IEC standard does not know anything like a "default tool chain", that was my point. It knows/defines "translation unit", "linkage"...
  8. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    The C++ standard describes how to implement the...

    The C++ standard describes how to implement the standard (which also describes the language, of course). According to the C++ stadard, a program exists of one or more translation units (which MAY be...
  9. And finally - Honton and every single post of him...

    And finally - Honton and every single post of him (even the infamous "Gnome kills KDE" Thread) got removed. Phoronix get's usable, again. Thx alot!
  10. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Again: the "C++ standard" as in the official...

    Again: the "C++ standard" as in the official ISO/IEC document (erendorn tried to argue with quoting it) does not mention any tools, especially it does not mention any sources where code has to come...
  11. ... Yeah. Baloo implements the feature set that...

    ... Yeah. Baloo implements the feature set that actually get's used by applications, probably the rest will be coming again. YOU WON'T NOTICE ANY MISSING FEATURE!!!
    But why the hell nautilus removed...
  12. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Eh, you don't have any idea of what you are...

    Eh, you don't have any idea of what you are talking about, don't you? Header files usually don't even get compiled (as in "compiled into an object file"), it simply contains declarations and...
  13. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    moc input == headers (at least most of the times...

    moc input == headers (at least most of the times - you can run moc on .cpp files as well, if it contains class definitions). Headers won't compile without ANY implementation file (if the definitions...
  14. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Of course moc is not the implmentation, it's a...

    Of course moc is not the implmentation, it's a code generator. There is (as said a thousand times) a set of macros (signals, emit, Q_PROPERTY, ...) and classes (QObject, QMetaObject, QMetaMethod,...
  15. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Could you tell me where in the standard I can...

    Could you tell me where in the standard I can read that the code has to be written by a human being? I never stumbled across such a clause.
    The standard also doesn't mention something like a build...
  16. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    Doesn't make any sense... First you said moc is...

    Doesn't make any sense... First you said moc is OK, the input is the issue, now it's the missing implementation.
    That's what moc is used for. You always can write all the code moc creates on your...
  17. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    moc creates definitions. If you don't run moc the...

    moc creates definitions. If you don't run moc the files still compile cleanly, you only will get link failure due to missing definitions. So even the moc input is standard compliant, as it get's...
  18. Replies
    90
    Views
    21,223

    IMHO the "isn't standard thanks to moc" argument...

    IMHO the "isn't standard thanks to moc" argument against Qt was the most important one by some Gnome-Devs. At the same time they developed vala as the "next gen of gnome development". Vala only...
  19. I am running Gentoo on a laptop. It get's...

    I am running Gentoo on a laptop. It get's restartet only once a month or even less. Since years I am doing updates of firefox while it is running and NEVER had it crash. Having to restart for an...
  20. Replies
    115
    Views
    11,815

    I am not the person you think you answered to....

    I am not the person you think you answered to. Don't get confused.
Results 1 to 20 of 100
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4