Search:

Type: Posts; User: argor; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. well ImgTec did not write the drivers Tungsten...

    well ImgTec did not write the drivers Tungsten Graphics did

    here is a thread about it in imtec forum http://www.imgtec.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=610#top
  2. Replies
    34
    Views
    23,634

    why the need to reverse-engineere BeagleBoard...

    why the need to reverse-engineere
    BeagleBoard
    has drivers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ToYOgP9f9U&feature=PlayList&p=1BAB6EE9CC7285AD&index=5
    here is also OGRE3D running on a beagleboard...
  3. Replies
    34
    Views
    23,634

    no it is up to TI what they support or not they...

    no it is up to TI what they support or not they did desited to only provided support for opengl es 1.1 and 2.0
    just like Intel could provided support for opengl es
    it just depend on what marked...
  4. Replies
    34
    Views
    23,634

    what is so crippled about the driver they were...

    what is so crippled about the driver they were were the beta OpenGL ES
    drives yes they are blop drives whith GPL compatible kernel wedges
    just like Nvidia

    did powervr not provided intel whith...
  5. Replies
    34
    Views
    23,634

    well the pandora it is supported by the imtec ...

    well the pandora it is supported
    by the imtec drives
    i don't nou way intel did not use the imtec Linux drives
    they are bloop drives still they work far better than the intel tungsten drivers...
Results 1 to 5 of 5