How about this one?
Type: Posts; User: agd5f; Keyword(s):
How about this one?
You can drive up to 6 displays depending on the asic on all radeon GPUs since evergreen.
With this set of patches all chips that support UVD are now supported, except the old RV550 cards which, may work with the r6xx UVD code if someone wanted to play with it. The RV730 has had UVD...
I'm not sure how you could improve the memory reclocking. Memory reclocking has to be done during the vblank period to avoid display glitches during the reclock. With multiple monitors, the vblank...
What kernel are you using? That was fixed a while ago. It now shows the actual adjusted state not the base state.
No. rs780 and rs880 are 6xx based.
Please read this thread again. All 6xx asics and rv770/790.
Christian's patch to disable interop on chips that don't support field based decode just hit git today:
It polls the 3D/compute status registers directly. Ideally we'd expose those status registers via debugfs rather than making the application poll them directly. As for the GPU temperature, it's...
You need to use something like radeontop for load.
You can see the current GPU power state (clocks, voltages, etc.) in /sys/kernel/debug/dri/64/radeon_pm_info
on r3xx+ it was shaders. On r1xx/r2xx there was a special MC mode you could enable in the 3D engine.
The bigger issue is that gallium still needs some fixes for big endian.
The mpeg MC block is just shaders. There is no special hw.
Are you sure you don't have a gddr5 HD6450?
Sorry, to disappoint you, but it appears UVD 2.1 does not support field based decode. I just tested it on my rv770 and it works fine, but only if you apply this mesa patch:...
Yeah, I think that's ok. I noticed that when Christian first got it working; extending or adding a delay in that function fixed it. I'll see if I can dig up a patch.
I'm not sure what you are asking. Whether the driver supports field decode or not is determined by the radeon vdpau driver in mesa. This is the relevant mesa patch:...
xbmc requires it. I'm not sure off hand what other apps use it.
Give me a break. Enough trolling already. In which documents the authers choose to call it out specifically and why, I don't know, but it's irrelevant. All those chips all have UVD 2.0.