Working one :p
Type: Posts; User: dungeon; Keyword(s):
Working one :p
Looks OK, but i don't checked those replaces :o... that is yours, you can make it there how you like it ;).
Seems like Debian decided to go with this 3.16 kernel for Jessie :).
You don't need that separate glamor lib anymore, it is part of xserver :).
Generally you need packaging knowledge:
That may sound hard, but all books firstly sounds hard... but you...
In last post i said and i will said again :o
That means, DO NOT INSTALL PACKAGES WHICH CONTAINS I386 BINARIES!!! :D llvm-3.5:i386 contain binaries.
You only need libllvm3.5:i386...
mpv gets new release today... :cool: Instead users to read something about that, we have once again Linus said something about *shit*, it say *shit* and *crap* every *shity* day :D.
And i am...
That may say you what is wrong :).
Just keep in mind that only libraries and headers are multiarched in Debian, but not binaries ;)
That is what Linus like, it is not enough to calling something just *shit* :p. With "pure and utter" it sound better ;).
And he does not wrote, "GCC is Pure & Utter Crap" that is what Phoronix says :o. He just says to the bug reporter "your compiler is pure and utter *shit*" Where shit is not an my shit, but your...
On the first sight... what happens with the Radeon R7 260X :confused: Yesterday you had much better results (if i am reading it right, with the same stack) and now it looks broken :D
It is now fixed in the 4.8.3-6 as well which has SVN 20140725 (r213051), so not an issue anymore :cool:.
So it is usual stuff in development *shit happens* :o. It is only funny because Linus gets...
So it is fixed :D
Not sure why Michael Danzer triggers it: Debian has 4.9.1 up to the SVN 20140724 (r213031) that fix is included there :o
I am using Debian too and gcc-4.9.1 currently, but i did not building my kernels with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE so -Os, so not got this issue ;) -O2 does not trigger an issue :).
It might be...
That can be because steam shipped libraries ;), if some other 32bit game works fine, then problem is with that :).
It is not default and seems like recently does now work/compile :). So no it is not recommended :rolleyes:, you have warnings about that when you compile mesa:
You may try installing those checkinstall debs with dpkg --force-overwrite switch :).
I mean if only that same conf file is the problem, you can install it that way. Not sure but seems like some...
That means only GCN 1.0 hardware struggle in Unvanquished, but not GCN 1.1 ;). Interesting, but i guess it just a bug somewhere.
To avoid confusion about naming, from agd5f :D
3.5 will be released in a month:
But maybe it is typo and you mean about 3.6 :rolleyes:
RC1 is (pre) released :o few days ago :rolleyes:
But don't know for Fedora, it was available in Debian Sid at that day :).