Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

    Phoronix: ODROID-X Continues Battling The PandaBoard ES

    Here's the latest benchmarks of the low-cost ODROID-X, a $129 quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 development board out of Korea with ARM Mali 400 graphics.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=17838

  • #2
    Unity 2D removed

    As Unity 2d will be no more supported, can this boards can handle Unity 3d using software rasterizer? Michel can you please add some simple graphics benchmarks with Unity 2d and 3d in it?

    Comment


    • #3
      ODROID-X vs. Atom N2800 please! =)

      Comment


      • #4
        Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

        btw the Cubieboard is only $49.

        Comment


        • #5
          Does anybody know where can I find the odroid-x ubuntu image, or any documentation on installing ubuntu in a sd card for odroid?

          Comment


          • #6
            Odroid X vs N2800

            Originally posted by gururise View Post
            ODROID-X vs. Atom N2800 please! =)

            I found this (Exynos, no 7zip test, and atom N2800 only pass x264 and 7zip test) :
            http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...SU-1208231AR85
            http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...AR-INTELATOM08

            x264 then :
            Atom N2800 (cedarview 4 cores@1.8GHz) : 11.65 fps
            Exynos 4412 HardFP (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 10.01 fps
            Exynos 4412 SoftFP (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 4.72 fps

            11.65 / 1.8 = 6.472
            10.01 / 1.4 = 7.15
            Well, Atom is less good / Mhz. Some other Cortex A9 (like really cheap Rockchip, or HiVision (Huawei), Qualcomm Snapdragon S4) come in public products, this month at 1.6 and more Ghz. Both consume far less energy than atom and are less expansive.

            7zip:
            Atom N2800 (cedarview 4 cores@1.8GHz) : 2164
            Exynos 4412 Softfp (cortex A9 4 cores@1.4GHz) : 946

            When 7zip work in HardFP on Exynos 4412, with simple equation (HardFP vs SoftFP ratio >2), that is rough extrapolation, it should be equal than Atom N2800 with lower frequency.
            Last edited by Popolon; 09-05-2012, 04:05 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              When 7zip work in HardFP on Exynos 4412, with simple equation (HardFP vs SoftFP ratio >2), that is rough extrapolation, it should be equal than Atom N2800 with lower frequency.
              oops this is stupid, 7zip should is pure integer. But ASM optimization for arm are only on CRC in the 7zip stable sourcecode, and there aer x86 asm optipimization for other parts. The comparison is not really fair for now.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by uid313 View Post
                Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

                btw the Cubieboard is only $49.
                ... Its .. Its ... perfect! Sata + ARM + HDMI for $50!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by uid313 View Post
                  Too bad it doesn't got Gigabit Ethernet and USB 3.0.

                  btw the Cubieboard is only $49.
                  Not a bad little board for $49! But the ODROID-X is quad core Cortex A9 vs single core Cortex A8 of the Cubieboard. The ODROID-X also runs at a higher freq. and has more expansion options. I guess if you are okay with much much slower performance, the Cubieboard for $49 is a pretty good deal.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X