Basically it is nothing "new", lots of benchmark tests (on win) show the fps drawn on a time graph. Also you should not compare your system against his, because the gfx card is definitely different. When the card is fast (and only limited by driver) then other aspects like asset load time you have to take into account. Didn't you remember his remarks that load time could be tuned by a special kernel config - all that is more or less complete bullshit. Usually a 2nd run does not show these peaks when everything is pre-cached. It's also the same person who would buy a 2.x ghz quad core for dual socket 2011 instead of a 3.5 ghz quad with turbo for gaming - just to fix jitter - do you call that normal?
No announcement yet.
Frame latency analysis on Doom 3