Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Interview With A Linux Game Porter

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    lol u have a hell of a resume no doubt.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Svartalf View Post
      Heh... You're reading my remarks wrong there. It's the middleware that's the problem, not sound support on Linux. There's no way I'm going to be able to cough up $5k to pay for the license when someone uses Miles on a game I'd like to port. FMOD's got similar gotchas and IrrKlang only provides binaries for x86 and no real source code access (so you can't make IrrKlang work on Pandora, Beagleboard, Android, PRE, or Maemo- all of which could be targets now.
      Developers are using these middleware systems because they are apparently easier to program for. They wouldn't want to pay the license for them either for the original game's platform, but they are, so apparently there is some kind of appeal. This appeal should be implemented in free software as well to make Linux more attractive for them.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Yfrwlf View Post
        Developers are using these middleware systems because they are apparently easier to program for. They wouldn't want to pay the license for them either for the original game's platform, but they are, so apparently there is some kind of appeal. This appeal should be implemented in free software as well to make Linux more attractive for them.
        Coding for DirectSound is an evil mess. Same with DirectPlay.

        Miles/FMOD/IrrKlang/etc. get rid of the complexity and allow you to transparently target other platforms. $5k is chump change when you consider the willingness of the MacOS community to buy MacOS titles or if you're talking Wii or PS3. You'll make that back over it all. Most indies pick FMOD or IrrKlang right at the moment because the API's really easy to pick up, has reasonably painless licensing (IrrKlang's a pay once sort of affair depending on what licensing set you choose- it's only real drawback is that they typically don't provide source for it to you, so you're stuck with what they provide. I'm targeting more than just X86 or the sound would have been IrrKlang on Caster.).

        There's some FOSS solutions beginning to shape up to the same sort of thing and if needs be, I'll help make them happen. You're right on that score, we kind of need something more than what's out there.

        But to characterize it as being "bad" is overstating the problem, really.

        Comment


        • #19
          What an interesting coincidence. There's a conversation about the same subjects (viability of direct3d to opengl porting, etc) over at one thread at the official Bohemia Interactive forums, (http://forums.bistudio.com/showthrea...t=73279&page=6), which incidentally, I helped revitalize thanks to me. Over there, with the aid of one of their moderators, I started an online petition targetted at getting the most signatures as possible from the ArmA playing communities across the globe asking for a linux port of the BiA games. The petition is right here:

          http://www.petitiononline.com/saf3509/petition.html

          if anyone is interested in seeing ArmA 1 and 2, and maybe OpFlaspoint 1 native clients.

          But going back on topic, I think Svartalf and many others here like DragonLord would like to comment on the remarks being said on that thread, specially from members Hoak and miyalrdo.

          Comment


          • #20
            You know, something just occured to me.

            Originally posted by Svartalf
            Convincing people to stick with Linux when they make PC type gaming decisions.
            Is this the reason why Carmack and developers are losing interest in native Linux clients? I remember that with Quake Wars, I waited until I had the client sitting in my home folder to buy the game, but other people just went ahead and bought the game and ran it under wine. Heck, some people will just run the game under wine regardless of a native client. Just looks at Steam and Valve... How many linux gamers are under the mercy of the developers?

            Is it in our best interests to refrain from buying, or giving any attention, to games that offer no native linux client, and only consider games that do offer a native client?
            I like to think of that a man with a PS3 won't go out and buy 360 games, or vice versa.

            Comment


            • #21
              Ideologically this is great. But put into practice its not plausible. People are too stupid to take a step back and pour over information. I was one of these people. I bought the game and then tried to play over wine, it didn't work so windows it was .

              Another reason is because people dont think they can make a difference. Whats 1 person in a sea of millions. People wont even vote for there own government for this reason. Its so much easier to remain weak and cheat your way out of playing a game on windows then to be strong and wait out the storm.

              Comment

              Working...
              X