Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Linux Kernel SABOTEURS.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by lenrek View Post
    From lenrek's link: http://kerneltrap.org/node/6844

    From: grundig [email blocked]
    Subject: Re: reiserFS?
    Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:55:30 +0200

    "Let me also remember (remind) you that we have had other relevant filesystems for years (reiser3, XFS, JFS), and everybody is ok with them, nobody is planning to kill anyone,...."

    Do you think he knew more than he was saying and meant it to continue,....

    but with Reiser4 they plan to kill Reiser's wife and frame Reiser. That way Reiser4 will never be a competitive issue for various nasty software and database companies,....
    Last edited by Jade; 06-10-2008, 06:45 PM.

    Comment


    • #47
      Ah...

      Maybe aliens from Vega system or Mars are involve? You do know that, some believe aliens live among us? I bet, if they exist, they won't want to see such great accomplishment of Reiserfs4.
      Last edited by lenrek; 06-11-2008, 04:57 AM.

      Comment


      • #48
        http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...eiser-off.html

        this topic is getting way stupid.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by xploited View Post
          the reason why Reiser4 isn't in the kernel is a personal conflict between Hans and certain kernel developers. Even Linus admitted it.
          Do you have a quote/reference for this?

          Comment


          • #50
            Maybe this thread exist solely for for comic relief.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by lenrek View Post
              Ah...

              Maybe aliens from Vega system or Mars are involve? You do know that, some believe aliens live among us? I bet, if they exist, they won't want to see such great accomplishment of Reiserfs4.
              I would quote this one!!

              Hans Reiser made really a good job! Reiser4 was even better than alien file systems!!!!!

              Could be possible that Linus is an alien!?!

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Jade
                Reiser is in prison because his file-system was better... End of story.
                Originally posted by some-guy View Post
                #2 (for the red), THIS IS A FAKE LIE YOU MADE UP, STOP SPREADING IT
                How do you know whether this is a correct or not?

                How could you possibly know?

                Why are you so certain that Reiser is not in prison because his file-system was better,... when you cannot possibly know whether this is true or not,... unless, of course, you do KNOW that Reiser has been framed (in order to kill Reiser4) and are trying to stop people even considering that this is the case.

                Reiser's trial was a huge joke.

                With a little reading up, any intelligent person can see this.

                No matter how the liars spin it,... it is quite apparent that the trial (& verdict) was a total joke.

                Who was funding this amazing travesty of justice.

                Where was the money coming from.

                My guess is from various software and database interests. From the same people (and their puppets in the media) who were already trying to kill Reiser4.

                Who paid judge Trina Thompson Stanley to have Reiser held in solitary confinement without bail on the basis of the amazingly flimsy blood and missing seat "evidence."

                So, who pushed for solitary confinement, without bail, on the basis of "evidence," that attorney Daniel Horowitz describes as, trace, weak and inaccurate.

                Oct 12, 2006: "There's not a lot of forensic evidence at all. Whatever they got is trace," Daniel Horowitz said.

                Oct 12, 2006: Investigators are "leaking sensational information that may not even be accurate," Daniel Horowitz complained.

                Oct 23, 2006: The prosecution's case is weak. "Here's the statement of probable cause, and I've read it, and their case is much weaker than they've said it is," Horowitz said.

                So, who pushed for solitary confinement, without bail, on the basis of "evidence," that two months later will be called, "utterly unconvincing," by the judge Julie Conger.

                Dec 11, 2006: judge Julie Conger comments that she found Oakland PD's theory utterly unconvincing on account of its placements and timings of people not matching what had been established in court.

                But, disregarding her own publicly stated conclusion, she allows the trial to proceed anyway. I guess judge Julie Conger was bought as well.

                On Sept. 29, 2006, just three weeks after the supposed murder, the FBI is provides a "little bit of manpower," with the forensic investigation.

                How much pull and money, does it take to get the FBI involved in a missing person case so early in the case and before much of anything is actually known?

                Sept. 18, 2006: Guerrero said officers trailed Hans Reiser, both by car and by a special surveillance aircraft,...

                Who paid for around the clock surveillance by so many agents and for the special surveillance equipment?

                Who got the police so interested in this missing person case just two weeks after Nina Reiser had gone missing, that they devoted a fistful of dollars to it and with (at that time) no evidence, at all, of foul-play?

                Sept. 18, 2006. Alameda County commissioner Nancy Lonsdale declined to grant Reiser's custody request following testimony from Oakland police officers who said they had evidence that would argue against giving Reiser the children.

                Police said they couldn't share the evidence, not even with the commissioner.

                The police LIED when they claimed they couldn't share the evidence, not even with the commissioner, because they didn't have any evidence,... they just LIED.

                We now know that the police LIED. Who paid them to LIE.

                Who has enough pull to get the police to LIE?

                From http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showt...t=10902&page=2 (this thread has been censored for some unknown reason)

                Comment


                • #53
                  Ok, there are a lot of unusual circumstances around this case (as there are in so many others), but it's a file system for f***'s sake, not a thermonuclear device or a way to crash the financial system. Your so bothered? Then when you make your corrections and get it working release your own patches. If it's as good as it's made out to be (and it does sound very good) your patches will become a 'must have' for folks like the rt2500 patches are for some, different league but same principle.
                  If it gets enough attention the black helicopters will start hovering around your house, you will have an 'accident' and then will forever be a martyr to your cause.
                  As to the number of hits, it does seem strange. Trouble is, it's inconsistent with hits on other sites covering the story, that would suggest you have a script running to gain attention....or that someone else has a script running so folks think that just to discredit you....or is it the other way?...or...or...

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    IMO, Reiser sabotaged Reiser4, by trying too hard to make it the future of filesystems instead of just building a solid Linux filesystem. It got to the point that he suggested scrapping the existing VFS layer and reimplementing support for other filesystems with Reiser4 "plugins". Most of the so-called "personality conflicts" came out of disagreements about the philosophy behind Reiser4 and its implications for Linux in general, not some irrational hatred of Reiser personally. It's not just about a filesystem, it's about technical decisions that could affect every Linux filesystem.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      A new kernel and still no Reiser4.

                      The Linux Kernel SABOTEURS win yet another round.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Jade View Post
                        A new kernel and still no Reiser4.
                        Someone should actually submit it for inclusion and wait for the VFS gurus to give their blessing. AFAIR the last submission attempt was
                        around 1-2 years ago.

                        Calling the kernel people "sabotuers" on a random internet forum won't
                        help Reiser4's cause, you know. So please stop it. It's annoying.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Someone still develops Reiser 4?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by d2kx View Post
                            Someone still develops Reiser 4?
                            Yes, at least one former Namesys employee still fixes bugs and
                            does fixups for newer kernels.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              A new kernel and still no Reiser4.
                              well i'm still waiting for gentoo patchset for the new kernel. do you think it's also sabotage?

                              besides it's only been a day or two. can't you wait one stupid week? if you cannot wait, why don't you port reiser for 2.6.26 and stop sabotaging these forums?

                              (people who prefer stable kernels stick to 2.6.16.x line anyway. or similar kenrel branches).

                              that's the way it is. i had to wait ~10 days for aufs to get patched for 2.6.25. as most external kernel module users usually have to. kernel changes, developers have to follow.
                              Last edited by yoshi314; 07-15-2008, 08:12 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by yoshi314 View Post
                                well i'm still waiting for gentoo patchset for the new kernel. do you think it's also sabotage?

                                besides it's only been a day or two. can't you wait one stupid week? if you cannot wait, why don't you port reiser for 2.6.26 and stop sabotaging these forums?

                                (people who prefer stable kernels stick to 2.6.16.x line anyway. or similar kenrel branches).

                                that's the way it is. i had to wait ~10 days for aufs to get patched for 2.6.25. as most external kernel module users usually have to. kernel changes, developers have to follow.
                                He means there's no inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline.

                                but jade.... you did know that wasn't going to be in this release, since 2 weeks ago... why do you say it now?

                                But a question about you, are you skilled at programming? are you used to code?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X