If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It even works for normal screens, because instead of displaying the image at 100% of its width you display it at 50% and let the browser scale it. The end result is pretty much the same, instead of serving a 100KB JPEG you're now serving a 60KB WebP.
I see that Google logo works that way, it's a 538x190 png that is displayed at 50% (269x95) on their front page.
So what's wrong with SVGs that people don't use those for dynamically sized icons?
You can't SVG-ise a photo without ending up with a raster. So for many things SVG is a good idea, but not for things that are very complex.
There are some pretty amazing complex SVGs, but at that point it gets cheaper to just put a raster, for instance (size parity only at 2700x1800): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fileojikko2.3.svg
Last edited by GreatEmerald; 03-24-2014, 11:48 AM.
Reason: Turn off smilies
They've been applying their compression to static images as a way of testing it, but I think I might ask them about it as an image format.
I, too, I think that wrapping their prediction algorithms into an actual image format could provide some definitely interesting results.
(Probably even better then WebP, and in the range of what top-of-the-line wavelet compressors produce).