Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BFS 426 Scheduler Released For Linux 3.7 Kernel

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BFS 426 Scheduler Released For Linux 3.7 Kernel

    Phoronix: BFS 426 Scheduler Released For Linux 3.7 Kernel

    Version 426 of the BFS scheduler was released this weekend for the Linux 3.7 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTI1NDE

  • #2
    I've started using it recently on my desktop (i5 2500 kernel 3.5). The difference to CFS is absurd, with the standard CFS and running with light iowait the desktop starts becoming unresponsive. If I start something like a file transfer or a backup, the desktop becomes virtually unusable.

    With BFS I don't even notice something like a backup running. BFS makes Firefox almost seem responsive

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by talvik View Post
      I've started using it recently on my desktop (i5 2500 kernel 3.5). The difference to CFS is absurd, with the standard CFS and running with light iowait the desktop starts becoming unresponsive. If I start something like a file transfer or a backup, the desktop becomes virtually unusable.
      Just out of curiosity, what distro are you running? I've never noticed a problem with CFS, and I've never been able to see a difference with BFS on my i7 3930k or my i7 920. But, I'm running a fairly lightweight desktop (awesome) under Gentoo, and I'm using SSDs for the root partition on both machines. I also haven't looked into BFS since the 2.6.X days, so my experience may be out of date.

      I suppose I should emerge one of the kernel sources that includes BFS and give it another shot...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by talvik View Post
        I've started using it recently on my desktop (i5 2500 kernel 3.5). The difference to CFS is absurd, with the standard CFS and running with light iowait the desktop starts becoming unresponsive. If I start something like a file transfer or a backup, the desktop becomes virtually unusable.

        With BFS I don't even notice something like a backup running. BFS makes Firefox almost seem responsive
        A lot of people seems to have that problem with some kernels / hardware configurations. I'm not sure the design of CFS is to blame. For ex. on my old slow single core Atom N280 netbook, running a 2.6.35 kernel with CFS, I could run apt-get dist-upgrade and the system would still be responsive. But on my current much more powerful dual core AMD E350 laptop with current 3.x kernels stuff like apt-get, update-apt-xapian-index and even dropboxd can easily cause some serious lag.
        Last edited by nej_simon; 12-17-2012, 08:41 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nej_simon View Post
          A lot of people seems to have that problem with some kernels / hardware configurations. I'm not sure the design of CFS is to blame. For ex. on my old slow single core Atom N280 netbook, running a 2.6.35 kernel with CFS, I could run apt-get dist-upgrade and the system would still be responsive. But on my current much more powerful dual core AMD E350 laptop with current 3.x kernels stuff like apt-get, update-apt-xapian-index and even dropboxd can easily cause some serious lag.
          I think the problem is reoccurring, all the same hardware (i7 with SSD etc.) with Fedora 16/17/18.
          copy ~20GB from A to B locally -> freezes video playback for 1-2 seconds and/or input devices now and then
          copy ~2GB over the network (NFS) -> freezes video playback for 1-2 seconds and/or input devices now and then
          Then a couple of updates later the problem disappears. A few updates later or distro upgrade and the problem is back...

          The i7 is not as good in multitasking as the A10 for example, but this shouldn't happen IMHO. It doesn't happen all the time, but comes and goes...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by disi View Post
            I think the problem is reoccurring, all the same hardware (i7 with SSD etc.) with Fedora 16/17/18.
            copy ~20GB from A to B locally -> freezes video playback for 1-2 seconds and/or input devices now and then
            copy ~2GB over the network (NFS) -> freezes video playback for 1-2 seconds and/or input devices now and then
            Then a couple of updates later the problem disappears. A few updates later or distro upgrade and the problem is back...

            The i7 is not as good in multitasking as the A10 for example, but this shouldn't happen IMHO. It doesn't happen all the time, but comes and goes...
            I've never had any of these problems and I have a laptop with an i5 and a hybrid hdd...

            Comment


            • #7
              In addition to the primary design goals of the bfs, increased desktop
              interactivity and responsiveness, kernels patched with the ck1 patch set
              including the bfs outperformed the vanilla kernel using the cfs at nearly all the
              performance-based benchmarks tested.
              I think the BFS scheduler has proven its merit in desktop usage, and using CFS for anyhing less than multiprocessor environments seems counterintuitive. I don't know enough about the inner workings of CFS to give more critic about it, but usually KISS applies.

              Last edited by varikonniemi; 12-17-2012, 03:39 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                It would be interesting to see how BFS compares to the latest CFS now that the fixes & io patches have been added in 3.9. The only benchmark I could find @ Phoronix is dated Sep 2009.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by halo9en View Post
                  It would be interesting to see how BFS compares to the latest CFS now that the fixes & io patches have been added in 3.9. The only benchmark I could find @ Phoronix is dated Sep 2009.
                  BFS has not been ported yet to 3.9. This usually happens about a week or two after the final comes out.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by halo9en View Post
                    It would be interesting to see how BFS compares to the latest CFS now that the fixes & io patches have been added in 3.9. The only benchmark I could find @ Phoronix is dated Sep 2009.
                    I compared 3.8* with BFS to 3.9-rc4/rc5 with CFS and it seemed that 3.8* with CFS and following patch (sched: Fix select_idle_sibling() bouncing cow syndrome) was better

                    at least in my opinion


                    it might have gotten better now - didn't follow if additional patches got added


                    3.8.* with BFS and BFQ is current best for me in terms of interactivity

                    3.9 with CFS had still noticably longer delays and stuttering - but it's getting significantly better

                    so it might only take some more kernel releases and it's "acceptable"

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X