Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The KDE vs. GNOME Schism In Free Software

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Let's add Android, ChromeOS, Moblin and Unity to the schisms

    Let's add Android, ChromeOS, Moblin and Unity to the schisms. All of these are corporate-sponsored. The fact that the corporate entities don't work together to build a single product shows that they don't care about the long-term viability of the software. For the hardware manufacturers (Google and Intel), the software can go to *ell after they've sold devices containing it. In fact, I'm sure some higher ups see the the lack of cross-pollination as a good thing, since they get to keep improvements to themselves.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by V!NCENT View Post
      whilst no one being realy serious can say that Gnome is better than KDE.
      I'll say it, here and now. Gnome *is* better than KDE, from my experience. Others may have their own opinions, but I personally find Gnome (both 2, and now 3) much more usable than KDE.

      Comment


      • #18
        oh this takes me back in time... 2007 to be exact: http://zerias.blogspot.com/2007/09/q...tk-impact.html

        *yawns*

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by kraftman View Post
          Why it's insulting? I don't want KDE to go the same way as Gnome, something wrong with that? Reading some of his responses makes me wonder in what world is he living?
          I think you're reading that quote out of context - I think he's actually saying the same thing as you, complaining about people who argue "this isn't Gnome" as a reason why their requested feature should be added to KDE. Much of that blog post amounts to "developers are mature adults; please act like one when dealing with them", with a distinct dislike of users who act as if entitled to make demands.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Delgarde View Post
            I'll say it, here and now. Gnome *is* better than KDE, from my experience.
            Based on what workflow/feature/technology/efficiency/whatever do you claim that it is better? What is so fundamentaly 'better' about Gnome that makes it any better from a certain angle than XFCE?

            Oh yeah, that's right; even XFCE 4.8 beats the shit out of speed, features and workflow.

            Could you please tell me what part of Gnome 3 actually still resembles a DESKTOP environment?

            Comment


            • #21
              Man, I keep seeing people complain about DESKTOP environments....

              The reason some Linux Desktop Environments are less focused on pure desktop functionality is because... THEY ARE BEING MADE FOR USERS, NOT DEVELOPERS. And users are going over to a more touch based interface, smaller and more portable devices.

              If Windows 8 X86/64 Tablets do arrive (which I believe will be quite interesting) then Unity/Gnome-Shell/KDE or whatever, will find MORE Touch Devices, and even less new desktops for them to be used on. ALso, ARM Tablets will run Win8, and Linux makers/Distros might want to be able to run on them as well.

              There are many USERS (Ie consumers, not dev's or Multimedia proff's) who have stopped buying new PC's as often, because many of them are quite happy with their iPad x's or the android tablets or WebOS or whatever (though mainly iPads ATM). So for software focusing on consumers, with limited developer resources, the more customizable and advanced interface is being treated second best to more touch intuitive interfaces for other devices.

              Anyway shoot down this post as you want xD
              Last edited by zeealpal; 09-27-2011, 09:17 PM. Reason: Bad grammer

              Comment


              • #22
                I love gnome 3 and gnome shell. I've been using the 3.2 beta on both my laptops and I'm normally a kde user.
                Yes it lacks customisations but there's actually very little I want to change. The notification system could be refined a little and I don't like the pop up system tray at all (I'd like to fix it so its only visible when on the activities overview) but other than that gnome-shell does the job I want, in an elegant, fast and as hassle free way.

                The most important things for a gui to do is to allow me to find and open apps fast, and to switch between, and view comfortably the apps that are open. Gnome-shell does this.
                With KDE I'd launch apps by hitting 'ctrl+f1' to open menu then begin typing to bring up the app and hit 'enter' to lunch it. Its almost the same in gnome-shell except I hit the super key. Unitys the same but there's other issues I have with unity that prevents me currently favouring it. I don't miss the old style gnome menu, I don't miss the minimize button and I don't miss kde widgets..... well folder view would be nice.
                Last edited by Nevertime; 09-27-2011, 10:05 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 89c51 View Post
                  I don't care about desktop schism and it doesn't matter much i think. What i find somehow annoying is the toolkit schism -or at least lack of the seamless cooperation between gtk,qt,enlightenment etc. Consistency is important and the lack of it hurts the experience.
                  And who do you think develops those toolkits? GTK is a GNOME project, EFL is an Enlightenment project.
                  In recent memory, there was not a single effort by GNOME to add at least one integration feature. Adding StatusNotifier to GTK 3.2 would've been a good first step. There wasn't even the sightliest attempt in adding that – instead a HTML5 back-end to eventually run GIMP in a web browser window… great…

                  Qt OTOH loads GTK themes just fine.
                  KDE develop a Oxygen GTK theme.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Two things disgust me in Linux. The desktop schism, and Gnome.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Awesomeness View Post
                      Adding StatusNotifier to GTK 3.2 would've been a good first step. There wasn't even the sightliest attempt in adding that.
                      Actually there was an attempt. There was even a working patch that would have done it. But other Gnome developers shot the idea down and it was never accepted.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by zeealpal View Post
                        Anyway shoot down this post as you want xD
                        Two words: plasma active. It will be out well before Windows 8 as well (November, I think). They are also already apparently getting a fair amount of corporate interest for using it in their devices. That is one of the benefits of plasma, they were able to create a radically new interface based on the same underlying framework, meaning all the improvements done for active benefit the desktop and netbook interfaces as well, while Microsoft has had to create an entirely new framework from scratch that apparently doesn't share much, if anything, with the older interface and instead just sits on top of it.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Awesomeness View Post
                          And who do you think develops those toolkits? GTK is a GNOME project, EFL is an Enlightenment project.
                          In recent memory, there was not a single effort by GNOME to add at least one integration feature. Adding StatusNotifier to GTK 3.2 would've been a good first step. There wasn't even the sightliest attempt in adding that – instead a HTML5 back-end to eventually run GIMP in a web browser window… great…

                          Qt OTOH loads GTK themes just fine.
                          KDE develop a Oxygen GTK theme.

                          EFL at least has tried to make integration with both QT and GTK
                          http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki...djeThemeEngine
                          ... unfortunately I do not think that it is very mature.

                          I wish the EFL guys will get more contributors (perhaps thanks to the rise of Bodhi).
                          Some embedded ports to IOS, Android and Inferno (Hellaphone) might also help...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by zeealpal View Post
                            The reason some Linux Desktop Environments are less focused on pure desktop functionality is because... THEY ARE BEING MADE FOR USERS, NOT DEVELOPERS. And users are going over to a more touch based interface, smaller and more portable devices.

                            If Windows 8 X86/64 Tablets do arrive (which I believe will be quite interesting) then Unity/Gnome-Shell/KDE or whatever, will find MORE Touch Devices, and even less new desktops for them to be used on. ALso, ARM Tablets will run Win8, and Linux makers/Distros might want to be able to run on them as well.

                            There are many USERS (Ie consumers, not dev's or Multimedia proff's) who have stopped buying new PC's as often, because many of them are quite happy with their iPad x's or the android tablets or WebOS or whatever (though mainly iPads ATM). So for software focusing on consumers, with limited developer resources, the more customizable and advanced interface is being treated second best to more touch intuitive interfaces for other devices.

                            Anyway shoot down this post as you want xD
                            Well, this finally explains why I cannot seem to get used to GNOME 3: I am a developer, using a desktop computer, and without any touch interface; thanks.

                            What puzzles me, however, is that the people who made GNOME 3 (developers, on a desktop computer, one may assume) seem to have forgot about themselves... what desktop environment do you think they use now?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              XFCE

                              Martin is obsolete, i use XFCE. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in either project. All i know is both are heavy, memory and cpu/gpu intensive which i don't like.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by kraftman View Post
                                The real winner here (and overall in Linux) may be Unity in Ubuntu. It really looks like a product with vision and users in mind.
                                Have to agree. I actually want to try it out when the new Ubuntu is released.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X