Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Debian TC Won't Pass Resolution Over Init System Coupling

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Debian TC Won't Pass Resolution Over Init System Coupling

    Phoronix: Debian TC Won't Pass Resolution Over Init System Coupling

    Since the Debian technical committee decided they will use systemd over Upstart, the latest vote on their agenda was over init system coupling and how Debian developers maintaining packages should deal with different init systems or what guidance the technical committee should send to these package maintainers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYxODI

  • #2
    Well, now it's time for a GR, which Jackson said he'd sponsor. And it's a 1:1 override. Although I don't think the GR would decide otherwise at this point.

    On my cases, I'm still updating the second one (plenty more objections in it now) and going forward with the third one:
    http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=57684
    http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=57899
    http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=58428

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Honton View Post
      blah blah blah
      Stick to your Qt bashing. Stay out of my Debian threads. Thank you...

      (Die, troll, die.)

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
        (snip) On my cases, I'm still updating the second one (plenty more objections in it now) and going forward with the third one (snip)
        This is pretty awesome! Thank you!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
          Well, now it's time for a GR, which Jackson said he'd sponsor. And it's a 1:1 override. Although I don't think the GR would decide otherwise at this point.

          On my cases, I'm still updating the second one (plenty more objections in it now) and going forward with the third one:
          http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=57684
          http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=57899
          http://aceattorney.sparklin.org/jeu.php?id_proces=58428
          Thanks for those!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DanL View Post
            Stick to your Qt bashing. Stay out of my Debian threads. Thank you...

            (Die, troll, die.)
            As a 14 year Debian user, systemd is the best choice.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
              As a 14 year Debian user, systemd is the best choice.
              I agree. I'm not really sure why you're quoting me...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DanL View Post
                Stick to your Qt bashing. Stay out of my Debian threads. Thank you...

                (Die, troll, die.)
                saying die troll die is that like telling someone to go kill them selves???

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DanL View Post
                  Stick to your Qt bashing. Stay out of my Debian threads. Thank you...

                  (Die, troll, die.)
                  Congrats on becoming that which you hate.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Skrapion View Post
                    Congrats on becoming that which you hate.
                    I don't see him trolling KDE or Systemd threads... so no no he hasn't. He hasn't even trolled this thread.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      He contributed nothing to this thread but telling somebody to die. If that's not trolling, I don't know what is.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View Post
                        I don't see him trolling KDE or Systemd threads... so no no he hasn't. He hasn't even trolled this thread.
                        He's known anti-qt troll, but on the other side he's sane enough to support systemd.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pawlerson View Post
                          He's known anti-qt troll, but on the other side he's sane enough to support systemd.
                          was referring to DanL not honton

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Pawlerson View Post
                            He's known anti-qt troll, but on the other side he's sane enough to support systemd.
                            It is not so much that he supports systemD, he just hates anything done by Canonical (which he hates because they have a DE that competes with Gnome). Since the only viable alternative to Upstart was systemD, he supports systemD by default.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by TheBlackCat View Post
                              It is not so much that he supports systemD, he just hates anything done by Canonical (which he hates because they have a DE that competes with Gnome). Since the only viable alternative to Upstart was systemD, he supports systemD by default.
                              The CLA, don't forget the CLA!

                              Anyway, this is a meta-discussion that should not be happening. This is about the TC announcing NOOP as their decision. Pretty funny, that, since in the end it's like saying "I hereby declare absolutely nothing!"
                              On the constitution changes, Jackson wonders if a 1:1 override should apply for every decision, while Barth doesn't agree. I think I agree with Barth here – if a GR can decide with a simple majority otherwise than the TC does, then what's the point of having a TC to begin with... Doing that would also be taken as a sign that the TC is doubting its own ability to decide things correctly (which I'm not even sure about, actually, considering both votes needed a tiebreaker).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X