Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ubuntu SDK Looks Towards Qt Creator

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by j2723 View Post
    I too would be interested in those lines/segments.
    I assume funkSTAR has done a thorough review of Qt's source code, so it should be very easy for him to poinpoint the offending lines (or segments), unless of course, he didn't actually review it.
    From what i gather, funky is mad that someone once made an application with DRM that happened to use Qt?

    I'm pretty sure people have done that with GTK, too... Sorry, funky.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
      From what i gather, funky is mad that someone once made an application with DRM that happened to use Qt?

      I'm pretty sure people have done that with GTK, too... Sorry, funky.
      I think he is arguing about the multi-licensing and business pactice of Trolltech (and now Digia), which allows companies to add DRM to proprietary versions of Qt.
      We are, however, using the GPL version on the desktop, not some proprietary modified Qt.

      http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...ement/page3#29
      http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...ement/page4#36
      Last edited by j2723; 03-07-2013, 12:56 AM.

      Comment


      • #18
        QTCreator is the closest thing Linux has to visual studio and the only sane option for writing C++ if you don't fancy vim.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
          From what i gather, funky is mad that someone once made an application with DRM that happened to use Qt?
          I think that he is outraged that there are some people out there who, at some time, have used software which was not primarily funded and written by RedHat.

          That's why he goes after anybody who doesn't use SystemD, PulseAudio, GNOME, GCC, etc.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
            I think that he is outraged that there are some people out there who, at some time, have used software which was not primarily funded and written by RedHat.

            That's why he goes after anybody who doesn't use SystemD, PulseAudio, GNOME, GCC, etc.
            Well being non-evil like redhat is fine. However I would praise Intel more right now. They are commiting to levels where redhat dont go. Hardware, Valve etc. Im sorry if caring about sustainable freedom pisses u off. But hey you can just fuck off to iOS or the like.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
              From what i gather, funky is mad that someone once made an application with DRM that happened to use Qt?

              I'm pretty sure people have done that with GTK, too... Sorry, funky.
              No Im mad because a bunch of neckbeards are in total denial about the fact that Qts business model very much includes fucking around and supporting DRM. Free software can be used for many unethical things like DRM or cluster bombs. I dont mind, BUT STOP PRETENDING THAT Qt IS NOT DOING BUSINESS WITH DRM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Qt Creator is a fantastic IDE, it obliterates Eclipse w/ CDT.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by funkSTAR View Post
                  Valve ... sustainable freedom
                  That sums it up, really. You praise involvement Valve's DRM-infested closeware, and rally against every single Free Software project which is not the default in your distribution.

                  Troll.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
                    Troll.
                    ORLY? :-P Seriously, why do people keep feeding him?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by RealNC View Post
                      ORLY? :-P Seriously, why do people keep feeding him?
                      Last time I checked, they cared about false information not reaching each of those 3 people who have yet to add the guy to their ignore lists.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
                        Last time I checked, they cared about false information not reaching each of those 3 people who have yet to add the guy to their ignore lists.
                        Was I included as one of those 3 people? If so, you can decrement that counter .

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X