Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wayland/Weston 0.99 Is Out, 1.0 Next Monday

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    lolololol at "apple giving a hand" at wayland's development

    when it's released and polished they will steal wayland and use it and then probably sue everyone else who uses it.


    apple uses x11 because it's cancer and fail, just like apple. And it's not like of apple to use the 39348 billions, they have in the coffers from selling shiny anal beads to retards, to actually invest in the development of computing technology.

    what for? some retards will keep working on bsd,x11, wayland and then all apple has to do is come and steal it.


    I will finish by saying SHAME YOU APPLETARDS SHAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEE, wayland is beauty in code form and it will benefit ALL those are running linux and yet you appletards want people to worry about your retinavaginas instead? LOLOL for the benefit of the 69 people who run linux on maccock pros.

    may your macs be filled with gay porn just as your lifes are filled with fail.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Pallidus View Post
      lolololol at "apple giving a hand" at wayland's development

      when it's released and polished they will steal wayland and use it and then probably sue everyone else who uses it.


      apple uses x11 because it's cancer and fail, just like apple. And it's not like of apple to use the 39348 billions, they have in the coffers from selling shiny anal beads to retards, to actually invest in the development of computing technology.

      what for? some retards will keep working on bsd,x11, wayland and then all apple has to do is come and steal it.


      I will finish by saying SHAME YOU APPLETARDS SHAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEE, wayland is beauty in code form and it will benefit ALL those are running linux and yet you appletards want people to worry about your retinavaginas instead? LOLOL for the benefit of the 69 people who run linux on maccock pros.

      may your macs be filled with gay porn just as your lifes are filled with fail.

      That's racist against Gay people .. :|

      Comment


      • #33
        apple cannot "steal" s*** you retard. apple took bsd and improved it, but you can still have access to the bsd. open source licenses cannot be revoked.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by garegin View Post
          apple cannot "steal" s*** you retard. apple took bsd and improved it, but you can still have access to the bsd. open source licenses cannot be revoked.
          The issue is about not having access to whatever improvements they make.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by garegin View Post
            apple cannot "steal" s*** you retard. apple took bsd and improved it, but you can still have access to the bsd. open source licenses cannot be revoked.
            Of course they shamelessly steal whatever they think is good.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW0DUg63lqU

            Crapple wasn't even able to come up with their own clock design so they stole it from the swiss railway company.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Rigaldo View Post
              The issue is about not having access to whatever improvements they make.
              then that's not "stealing". you still have access to the same ghetto crackhouse that is BSD. also apple "gave back" webkit, cups, OpenBSM, darwin, launchd, iokit. GPL, btw, does not prevent "locking out the improvement". WebOS used the linux kernel, yet it was closed source.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by garegin View Post
                then that's not "stealing". you still have access to the same ghetto crackhouse that is BSD. also apple "gave back" webkit, cups, OpenBSM, darwin, launchd, iokit. GPL, btw, does not prevent "locking out the improvement". WebOS used the linux kernel, yet it was closed source.
                Unless the source of the kernel they use is also closed and derived from Linux, then their probably not locking anything that they're not allowed to.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by garegin View Post
                  then that's not "stealing". you still have access to the same ghetto crackhouse that is BSD. also apple "gave back" webkit, cups, OpenBSM, darwin, launchd, iokit. GPL, btw, does not prevent "locking out the improvement". WebOS used the linux kernel, yet it was closed source.
                  No it's not stealing, but 'giving back' is a bit of a stretch when it comes to some things you listed, webkit was a fork of khtml which was LGPL-licenced so they had to 'give back', cups was an existing GPL-licenced printer solution which apple bought because they needed the functionality.

                  Darwin was open sourced but most of the code was licenced under 'apple public source licence' which is copyleft'ish and AFAIK incompatible with BSD (and of course with GPL) and as such the BSD projects which contributed so much to what made up OSX can't use the APSL licenced darwin code which Apple 'gave back'.

                  There was the community-based OpenDarwin project based upon the Darwin source release which shut down due to lack of developer interest, followed by PureDarwin which seems to share the same fate.

                  And what's with the BSD 'ghetto crackhouse' comment?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    how is it not called 'stealing' ???


                    you pick something that is free and open and you steal it, modify it slightly and then repackaged it and sell it for $2000 (the only reason people buy macbooks etc is because they have os x, if they had win7 they would just be another one in a long line of laptops)

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Pallidus View Post
                      how is it not called 'stealing' ???


                      you pick something that is free and open and you steal it, modify it slightly and then repackaged it and sell it for $2000 (the only reason people buy macbooks etc is because they have os x, if they had win7 they would just be another one in a long line of laptops)
                      Believe it or not, there's actually people who believe that macbooks are better hardware wise than PCs with the same specs. 0_o
                      Or like the design sometimes(not that it's worth that much).

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        better hardware???

                        better hardware???? are they fucking demented?


                        tell me have you fucking appletards even opened your mac computers????


                        let me tell you: cpu is exactly the same and interchangeable (yes you can pick that undervoltage i5 and replaced it with one from a pc and it's the exact same shit)

                        ram same exact brands, same exact shit, ssd and hd drives SAME BRANDS SAME SHIT..

                        graphics card models nvidia amd intel exactly the same shit used in pc's. audio etc ec

                        motherboards made by foxconn (and yes you can't "buy" them same as you can't "buy" a asus zenbook motherboard)

                        the only thing that can fuck you up when you try to fix a broken mac is if the motherboard is fried lolololol trying to buy a motherboard from apple is like trying to get a stripper to blow you if you don't have coke.

                        apple = pc hardware + shiny boxes with beads and lights

                        os x = bsd + shiny boxes with beads and lights

                        apple consumer = gullible sheep with more money than inteligence.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Pallidus View Post
                          how is it not called 'stealing' ???
                          Well, since the authors of the code actively chose a licence which allows proprietary companies to take the code, modify it and not return those modificatons then it can hardly be called stealing as it's exactly what is allowed by the licence.

                          Chances are that the code authors 'hope' that code enhancements be returned but they obviously don't require it. I personally think BSD/MIT-style licencing is generous to a fault, and for some code I find it to be a great licence, for others (mainly large collaborative projects involving lots of companies or full applications) not so much.

                          But my personal opinion is of no consequence, it's the choice of licence made by the code author(s) that matters. Those choosing to licence their code as BSD/MIT or any other permissive licence are (most likely) well aware of the fact that they may never see any return of any code improvements made.

                          It's their code, their choice, and using that code in accordance with the licence cannot be called 'stealing'. An exploiting douchebag...? perhaps

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            @Pallidus

                            Hope you didn't misunderstand, I neither have any Apple product nor do I find them better in any way.
                            But I've found both on the internet and in real life that some people [wrongly] believe that Apple hardware has better quality/durability or something, even though it's the same model also used in PCs actually. And practically the same in everything.
                            Often underclocked on Macs though ..
                            Also I think they use rebranded ARM processors on their iPads. I mean they're ARM, but they're called Apple-something ..
                            Please relax, don't get upset.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I hope that tomorrow is a good day!


                              Last edited by Mi7ch3a2el; 10-20-2012, 12:39 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                "Well, since the authors of the code actively chose a licence which allows proprietary companies to take the code, modify it and not return those modificatons then it can hardly be called stealing as it's exactly what is allowed by the licence."


                                hence why bsd is and will always remain a pile of fail.



                                but what abou the oher stuff that apple has stolen like x11, etc... those are released with a gpl license right? so how come you never seen ANY commits from apple ?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X