Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help finding a Distro

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by BhaKi View Post
    Slackware and openSuSE are the best KDE-based distros out there. Slackware is faster, bloat-free and more secure. But its package management is less intuitive compared to openSuSE and you need fair amount of experience with Linux (any UNIX-like OS) to be comfortable with Slackware. openSuSE has an excellent GUI control center for everything from package management to server administration.
    Nope, openSuSE state of now is too gnome centric.

    Comment


    • #22
      arch can't even properly version their kernels.

      if you want 'easy' go opensuse. Good KDE. Pretty recent software. Easy to use.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by t.s. View Post
        Nope, openSuSE state of now is too gnome centric.
        might change soon. Opensuse users told novell that they are pissed off with all the gnome crap.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by t.s. View Post
          Nope, openSuSE state of now is too gnome centric.
          openSUSE at the moment is de neutral. SLED in gnome biased and as energyman says don't be surprised if KDE becomes the default desktop again soon in openSUSE.

          https://features.opensuse.org/306967

          • Votes: 550
          • Positive: 426
          • Neutral: 8
          • Negative: 116

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by energyman View Post
            arch can't even properly version their kernels.
            Erm, fail
            Code:
            andrew@Serenity:~$ pacman -Qi kernel26 | grep -i version
            Version        : 2.6.30.5-1
            It doesn't add the minor release version to the kernel name however
            Code:
            andrew@Serenity:~$ uname -r
            2.6.30-ARCH
            ...but that's a name, nothing more.
            Last edited by Mora; 08-19-2009, 06:14 PM.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Mora View Post
              Erm, fail
              Code:
              andrew@Serenity:~$ pacman -Qi kernel26 | grep -i version
              Version        : 2.6.30.5-1
              It doesn't add the minor release version to the kernel name however
              Code:
              andrew@Serenity:~$ uname -r
              2.6.30-ARCH
              ...but that's a name, nothing more.
              your point?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by AdrenalineJunky View Post
                your point?
                That energyman has been reiterating the same moronic argument for months.

                Arch's versioning scheme is working perfectly. The package manager reports the correct version; you can install any version side-by-side; you can change the name to "look ma, no hands" and it will still work fine.

                This argument was stupid when energyman made it last year. It's still stupid now.

                Comment


                • #28
                  look into boot. What do you find there on an arch system?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    @blackstar - i don't think i was in my right mind when i asked that question....

                    @energy man - that has nothing to do with versioning and everything to do with not having to update the grub menu.lst after every kernel install. there are quite a few distro's that do it that way actually.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      *yawn* you don't have to update menu.lst/grub.conf if you do it right.

                      kernel with version + symlink. Works fine, is save. Arch can not do it? Made by idiots or broken? What is it?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X