Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
About open, ITU H.264 was developed on a public mailing list namely JVT-experts, using public FTP containing software, spec drafts, proposed changes, test results, meeting protocols and god knows what else. Anyone could read in near realtime what was discussed, proposed,changed and why and any expert that wanted to contribute iam pretty darn sure would have been taken serious. google webm is On2 last video codec, that to the best of my knowledge was developed behind closed doors by On2 and On2 people where on the jvt-expert list.
Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
That said, I don't expect much from Thor right now, but that's because it's not optimized at all yet, it's far from a finished product (no rate control yet, probably no visual optimizations of any kind). It's just a pure tech demonstration right now, not something to be used by end users. While VP9 is or at least should be optimized by now and is meant for end users. Thor does have tech available that VP9 doesn't though, like b-frames and multiple reference frames, so tech-wise, it quite likely has the edge over VP9.
Originally posted by SystemCrasher
View Post
Seems to me you have some sort of agenda against Cisco, instead of being interested in properly discussing codec tech.
Comment