Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GIMP Gets Good Metadata Support Via Exiv2

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by jonnor View Post
    Its a way off yet. There are still performance regressions after the move to GEGL and some subsystems need to be updated to make sense with the new capabilities. Help wanted!
    I am no coder, unfortunately.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by ua=42 View Post
      I find it ironic that gimp refuses to change its name. It's the main reason I never recommend the program to anyone.
      The only project that has a worst name that I know of is Gigolo.
      How is an image of a person head to toe wrapped in bondage gear less offensive than a Richard Gere selling his services in American Gigolo?

      Comment


      • #18
        Anyone know if they've got layer group masks in 2.9 yet? I was a bit annoyed that got pulled from the list of planned features for 2.8. That is in my top 5 most missed features from Photoshop that GIMP is lacking, (the others being smart objects, adjustment layers, layer effects and a proper unified transformation tool for moving, rotating and scaling that doesn't apply changes until you're finished with the tool.) Basically the sort of stuff needed to have a proper non-destructive work flow.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by hyperchaotic View Post
          Tried to post a picture for you but didn't show up. URL: http://i.imgur.com/dYPnMW2.png

          (on Windblows because PrtScr didn't work in Linux Mint when the menu was open)
          Thank you very much for sharing the latest work progress! By any chance, does it solve the banding issue with gradient tool?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ua=42 View Post
            I find it ironic that gimp refuses to change its name. It's the main reason I never recommend the program to anyone.
            The only project that has a worst name that I know of is Gigolo.
            So you approve of pantyshot?

            Comment


            • #21
              Banding.

              Originally posted by siavashserver View Post
              Thank you very much for sharing the latest work progress! By any chance, does it solve the banding issue with gradient tool?
              My pleasure. I don't know about the gradient issue. Found this in their Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687650. It seems to imply that it might be less of a problem with 16 or 32 bpp.

              If you want to try; a recent Windows devbuild is available from http://www.partha.com/. A PPA for Linux dev builds is also available: http://www.webupd8.org/2013/10/gimp-...nt-builds.html.

              Comment


              • #22
                derp

                Originally posted by hyperchaotic View Post
                with 16 or 32 bpp.
                Sorry, derped, didn't mean 16 or 32 bpp

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by hyperchaotic View Post
                  Sorry, derped, didn't mean 16 or 32 bpp
                  No problem, thanks again

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by IanS View Post
                    Anyone know if they've got layer group masks in 2.9 yet?
                    Not yet. To be done, though

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X