Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME 2.28 Beta Arrives, Release Next Month

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by spykes View Post
    Most of the things changed in KDE4 are not visible by the end user as well. In term of UI design, KDE4 has not changed much of the previous known paradigm in KDE3.
    The underlying technology used by Gnome 3.0 may not have a total redesign (despite the use of new components like clutter, vala and other things) but the changes will be more visible from a user point of view.
    Originally posted by spykes View Post
    As it's still under heavy development, I think it's a bit early to say that for the time being... Nothing is definitive for now.
    I understand your point of view, but KDE 4's Plasma is a big change to the old paradigm of the desktop. KDE 4 overall is very different from the third version, but Gnome with Gnome shell isn't going to make it revolutionary.

    GNOME Shell from my point of view isn't a spectacular feature, nor something that is going to be liked by the end user as well. (for example, I don't want to see all the time my recent docs...). I like much more the expose features of which deanjo writes about, plus the Lancelot Plasma widget than Gnome Shell.

    A new paradigm could be something like Symphony OS, but you need also usability.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by KDesk View Post
      GNOME Shell from my point of view isn't a spectacular feature, nor something that is going to be liked by the end user as well. (for example, I don't want to see all the time my recent docs...).
      That's the problem when you are trying to implement other paradigms... You take the risk to be disliked by the mass used to previous things.
      However I prefer they try to do that, instead of just copying what proprietary OSes do.
      I will give Gnome Shell its chance.

      Comment


      • #18
        I'm all for having GNOME-Shell being available as an OPTION -- not the default interface. Completely changing the way users interact with their desktop is a good way to alienate them.

        I think some of the new features in the shell could be really neat, but the learning curve for new users (or users that have been using GNOME for a while) will be too great to justify the change.

        As long as they keep gnome-panel supported, one should be able to manually arrange the desktop in the same way. That's what we'll do with Nexradix if GNOME-Shell ends up being mandatory. Otherwise, we'll probably have to switch to XFCE.

        I really wish developers in both the Free Software and the proprietary development worlds would realize that making major interface changes hurts more than helps. If they really feel a feature is a necessary improvment, they should either gradually move to the new design, or make the old interface default and let the user manually select the new one.

        Comment


        • #19
          Has anyone switched to Gnome from KDE? If you did, do you like your choice?

          I am contemplating the switch. KDE 4 is crap, imho and too many applications don't work right or work at all anymore on the KDE desktop. It is my impression, that KDE developers now care more about the aesthetics and the visuals rather than functionality and that applications work sufficiently. The focus seems to be on that way too heavily.

          Anyway, I didn't like Gnome last time I tried it (I think Ubuntu's current release was at 7.10 back then). But, I might have to re-visit it since too many problems are in KDE 4 (from my p.o.v.). I am sure KDE fans will have a different opinion and raise several excuses.

          Comment

          Working...
          X