Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PC-BSD 10.0 vs. PC-BSD 9.2 vs. Ubuntu 13.10 Benchmarks

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PC-BSD 10.0 vs. PC-BSD 9.2 vs. Ubuntu 13.10 Benchmarks

    Phoronix: PC-BSD 10.0 vs. PC-BSD 9.2 vs. Ubuntu 13.10 Benchmarks

    After running through some challenges in setting up PC-BSD/FreeBSD 10.0 and its many changes, here are benchmarks of the feature-rich operating system update. Benchmarks were done on the same laptop of PC-BSD 10.0, the former PC-BSD 9.2 release, and Ubuntu 13.10.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19912

  • #2
    All of the operating systems were cleanly installed and left using their default settings/packages, including their default file-systems, default compiler choices, etc, since they are all design choices made by the distribution vendor.
    So, PC-BSD10 comes with the nVidia blob by default? Really?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by phoronix View Post
      Phoronix: PC-BSD 10.0 vs. PC-BSD 9.2 vs. Ubuntu 13.10 Benchmarks

      After running through some challenges in setting up PC-BSD/FreeBSD 10.0 and its many changes, here are benchmarks of the feature-rich operating system update. Benchmarks were done on the same laptop of PC-BSD 10.0, the former PC-BSD 9.2 release, and Ubuntu 13.10.

      http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19912
      Im looking forward to the gcc vs gcc benchmarks. While it's interesting what performance *BSD users can expect using precompiled packages, the full potential of the platform is surely of interest, too.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Rexilion View Post
        So, PC-BSD10 comes with the nVidia blob by default? Really?
        According to Wikipedia, yes.

        Comment


        • #5
          PC-BSD is heavy on features by default.

          Where are the gaming benchmarks?

          Imo, PC-BSD is heavily modified with lot of added "extras", which slow it down. For instance, there is not option to choose UFS as the default filesystem while installation. I think it will perform better without zfs, which is the default.

          So can we have GhostBSD(FreeBSD with GUI) vs Debian vs Ubuntu?

          Thanks!

          Comment


          • #6
            FreeBSD 10 is now defaulting on LLVM/Clang 3.4 and I suspect will move to 3.5 when it's released and FreeBSD 10.1 is released.

            I imagine PC-BSD will follow suit.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by oleid View Post
              Im looking forward to the gcc vs gcc benchmarks. While it's interesting what performance *BSD users can expect using precompiled packages, the full potential of the platform is surely of interest, too.
              BSD no longer installs GCC by default. It's optional.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
                BSD no longer installs GCC by default. It's optional.
                Sure, therefore my posting.

                Comment


                • #9
                  PC-BSD 10 seems to be nearly the same slow ****** as FreeBSD 10.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
                    FreeBSD 10 is now defaulting on LLVM/Clang 3.4 and I suspect will move to 3.5 when it's released and FreeBSD 10.1 is released.

                    I imagine PC-BSD will follow suit.
                    Are you use as Clang 3.4 is only in head at the moment?? Stable 10 defaults to Clang 3.3 (http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/?view=log)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X