Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mac OS X 10.8 vs. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Performance

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    sna?

    How does this compare when using a more updated Mesa stack (rc2 is nice, but using git feels really up-to-date) and the --enable-sna flag for the intel driver? Looking at previous articles, it seems that it would squeeze a few extra fps, but not much. Still might be interesting.

    +1 to the battery benchmarks.

    Comment


    • #12
      I'm waiting for a benchmark with Ubuntu 13.x with Wayland and Intel Graphics jeje.

      Comment


      • #13
        Quite strange Nexuiz was so slow. I remeber an article in 2011 where intel linux graphics was almost on par with windows..... but not with sandy bridge if i remeber well. Would be very nice to have a Win vs Linux benchmark with intel sandy bridge IGP (on a PC not on apple hw).

        Comment


        • #14
          OpenSSL performance

          I would like to know why Phoronix keeps placing OpenSSL benchmarks if OpenSSL is deprecated in OS X.

          http://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com/...d-openssl.html

          http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7...acos-10-7-lion

          Not surprisingly, OpenSSL has a very low performance on OS X. Is there a chance the Phoronix Test can be updated with Common Crypto?

          So we could see the security libraries Apple is working on and not the ones which are being phased out?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by DavidSan View Post
            I would like to know why Phoronix keeps placing OpenSSL benchmarks if OpenSSL is deprecated in OS X.

            http://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com/...d-openssl.html

            http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7...acos-10-7-lion

            Not surprisingly, OpenSSL has a very low performance on OS X. Is there a chance the Phoronix Test can be updated with Common Crypto?

            So we could see the security libraries Apple is working on and not the ones which are being phased out?
            I would like to know why there are compile benchmarks. OS X is using llvm and it is known it compiles faster, but the end result is much worse. Such tests are meaningless.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by kraftman View Post
              I would like to know why there are compile benchmarks. OS X is using llvm and it is known it compiles faster, but the end result is much worse. Such tests are meaningless.
              The end result was also tested.

              Comment


              • #17
                Plzz Battery life Benchmark!!!!

                Comment

                Working...
                X