You are contradicting yourself. You accept benchmarks like FreeBSD vs Linux vs OpenSolaris without problem. Even though they do not use same software or gcc version: one of them compiles to 64bit, the other compiles to 32 bit. One uses gcc v3.xx and the other uses gcc v4.xx. And you think those benhcmarks are fair because Linux wins. You even posted a benchmark where one Linux fanboy compared one old 800 MHz sparc Solaris vs a intel dual core 2.4GHz Linux and you think that is a good benchmark because Linux won.
You accept benchmarks on different hardware and different software when Linux win, and reject all benchmarks when Linux loose.
You sir, you are a humbug and a liar.
If a link is negative for Linux you reject it, it does not matter if it is Linus T that says so. If a link is good for Linux you immediately accept it. It does not matter if it is a Linux fanboy doing the worst and biased comparison in history - "it is a good and fair link"
Have I told you are a Humbug and FUDer? You earlier confessed you do FUD.
If I'm correct, I don't have to specify you a thing. In this link I gave someone claims Solaris is dead. I'm just pasting, why are you asking me?
-Kraftman, you are accused of a horrible crime. We will not tell you which crime. Do you confess? We will not specify.
I'm aware of this. However, how is this different of showing some Solaris guys or fanboys articles? Or public relations talk? Those are usually even worse then some blog post. Afaik you even gave a link to Bonwick's blog and he FUDs.
Regarding my links, do you consider my links to Linus T, Andrew Morton, etc - are FUD and lies? Do you think I have created my own web site and made up those interviews? Do you think I lie and FUD about those interviews?