Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intergrating profiling of Mesa into PTS using OProfiler

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I think Josť Fonseca (vmware/apitrace) has been doing some Mesa profiling ( http://jrfonseca.googlecode.com/svn/...llium.oprofile ).

    I've used his apitrace tool to do some very basic profiling to compare r600g with Catalyst (SwapBuffers taking 6-8 times longer with Mesa in my tests). Maybe it might be worth to identify the slow calls this way.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by log0 View Post
      I think Josť Fonseca (vmware/apitrace) has been doing some Mesa profiling ( http://jrfonseca.googlecode.com/svn/...llium.oprofile ).

      I've used his apitrace tool to do some very basic profiling to compare r600g with Catalyst (SwapBuffers taking 6-8 times longer with Mesa in my tests). Maybe it might be worth to identify the slow calls this way.
      Thanks I'll take a look at this too. Josť Fonseca's gprof2dot tool looks nice too it creates a good picture of whats going on and should give me a good example for processing the oprofile output.

      Comment


      • #13
        tarceri:

        Overall, the patch is looking good, one thing to point out though is that the pts_client shell_exec is called more often than just during the test execution, so the pts_module_manager::module_process('__post_test_ex ecution'); call would be inappropriate universally. That pts_client function is also called when installing tests and in a few other conditions too. Aside from that on the quick review the other code looks fine.
        Michael Larabel
        http://www.michaellarabel.com/

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Michael View Post
          tarceri:

          Overall, the patch is looking good, one thing to point out though is that the pts_client shell_exec is called more often than just during the test execution, so the pts_module_manager::module_process('__post_test_ex ecution'); call would be inappropriate universally. That pts_client function is also called when installing tests and in a few other conditions too. Aside from that on the quick review the other code looks fine.
          Yeah looks there are quite a few things I still need to work out. Anyway what ever happened to "Karsk" if you dont mind me asking?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by tarceri View Post
            Yeah looks there are quite a few things I still need to work out. Anyway what ever happened to "Karsk" if you dont mind me asking?
            Karsk was for some enterprise research and ended up working out okay but my lack of time prevented me from polishing it up and pursuing a version for public usage.
            Michael Larabel
            http://www.michaellarabel.com/

            Comment

            Working...
            X