Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

green energy (Germany) beat nuclear energy(France) in cost effiency!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by 1c3d0g View Post
    Ugh...just let this pointless thread die. Nothing more of value can come out of it after being infected by Qaridarium.
    This thread is infected by Qaridarium ?
    This does postulate that the thread was not infected at start.
    Have you realized that this thread was started by Qaridarium?
    In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?

    You confuse people.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by maldorordiscord View Post
      In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?
      Sounds like it's time for another poll

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by bridgman View Post
        Sounds like it's time for another poll
        What kind of poll? Maybe a pool about deleting all posts and threads written by Qaridarium?
        That would be funny: 5,415 Qaridarium posts and more than 100 threads started by Qaridarium lost.
        I think it will cause the largest Phoronix earthquake in history.
        A new black hole will be born here in the forum after the database cleanup.

        Like black mesa in half life!!!!

        Maybe michael drink his next beer in this glass (BLACK MESA PINT GLASS (BLACK)):





        Maybe the Phoronix Valve steam story will end because of this forum accident.

        RIP world RIP valve RIP forum its all lost because of the "Qaridarium" black-hole in the forum.

        Comment


        • #54
          Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by bridgman View Post
            Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"
            Thats not fair you doubled the "is" to make it sound "wrong" to emulate a more "Qaridarium" style...
            That would be an unacceptable influence on the result!

            "Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?""

            The fixed version should be much more scientific correct.

            But to stay on the level of the forum members you should write the name like this: Qaridium like the original poll http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...light=Qaridium

            Comment


            • #56
              I agree with your fixed version.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                I agree with your fixed version.
                You mean this version : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridium?"" right?
                Just to write correct inside of the "forum rule" the forum rule clearly point out that its not allowed to write the grammar wrong but its correct to write Qaridariums name wrong!

                Anyway the forum rule also point out that anyone who votes in this poll in a logical way get a ban-kick !!!!

                Comment


                • #58
                  f a leftist / Green politician is your idea of a reliable source on nuclear power, then you are a lost case
                  http://www.centplay.com/affiliate/id_139/

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X