Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

green energy (Germany) beat nuclear energy(France) in cost effiency!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Panix View Post
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/60189878-d...#axzz22JBCf2ku
    Why don't you quote the entire story and look at all the facts? Oh yeah, because you don't so you come to the quick conclusion that 'nuclear power' is mroe expensive or not as efficient or whatever incorrect conclusion you can think of as long as you can pretend these 'alternative' fuels are so much more cheaper. But, it's not a big surprise because Germans are fooled everyday and they don't seem to comprehend what's going on about anything (take a look at the EU/EURO swindle).
    No, I didn't quote the entire story, because it is illegal to do this. Well according to German law it's even forbidden to quote several sentences and the link.
    The main reason why I didn't share the link above is, because I can only read: "Nuclear ‘hard to justify’, says GE chief By Pilita Clark, Environment Correspondent" on this link (either a FT abo is necessary, or this content is blocked for Germans).

    I can troll as well: US Americans are fooled everyday, blablabla...
    Last edited by Fenrin; 08-01-2012, 11:48 AM.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Fenrin View Post
      No, I didn't quote the entire story, because it is illegal to do this. Well according to German law it's even forbidden to quote several sentences and the link.
      The main reason why I didn't share the link above is, because I can only read: "Nuclear ‘hard to justify’, says GE chief By Pilita Clark, Environment Correspondent" on this link (either a FT abo is necessary, or this content is blocked for Germans).

      I can troll as well: US Americans are fooled everyday, blablabla...
      So, how is it to live in your police state? It sounds like your police state is on a more severe level than mine.

      I think any rational person would realize I meant the 'whole story' as an expression. Forgive me, though, if I assumed your English was advanced enough. Yes, I meant, to indicate the 'whole story' as in 'here-is-the-link' so when you read the article, you can get somewhat of the whole story or at least a varied perspective. Taking something out of context is not always a good idea.

      But, I didn't know that the German government doesn't allow html links or to post a website in a forum. Must be great to live in a democratic country like Germany with Herr Merkel at the helm trying to help all the other bankrupt EU countries (read: BANKERS) with German Euros or whatever they're printing up to bail them out with. :-) Maybe you'll wake up tomorrow.

      Comment


      • #48
        So, how is it to live in your police state? It sounds like your police state is on a more severe level than mine.[...]Maybe you'll wake up tomorrow.
        I woke up every day so far, since I was born. I'm very grateful for it

        This thread is not about who is in the worst police state.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Fenrin View Post
          I woke up every day so far, since I was born. I'm very grateful for it

          This thread is not about who is in the worst police state.
          Um...ok??????????!?! Not sure what your point is but ok...

          Comment


          • #50
            Ugh...just let this pointless thread die. Nothing more of value can come out of it after being infected by Qaridarium.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by 1c3d0g View Post
              Ugh...just let this pointless thread die. Nothing more of value can come out of it after being infected by Qaridarium.
              This thread is infected by Qaridarium ?
              This does postulate that the thread was not infected at start.
              Have you realized that this thread was started by Qaridarium?
              In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?

              You confuse people.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by maldorordiscord View Post
                In other words a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?
                Sounds like it's time for another poll

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                  Sounds like it's time for another poll
                  What kind of poll? Maybe a pool about deleting all posts and threads written by Qaridarium?
                  That would be funny: 5,415 Qaridarium posts and more than 100 threads started by Qaridarium lost.
                  I think it will cause the largest Phoronix earthquake in history.
                  A new black hole will be born here in the forum after the database cleanup.

                  Like black mesa in half life!!!!

                  Maybe michael drink his next beer in this glass (BLACK MESA PINT GLASS (BLACK)):





                  Maybe the Phoronix Valve steam story will end because of this forum accident.

                  RIP world RIP valve RIP forum its all lost because of the "Qaridarium" black-hole in the forum.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                      Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread is more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?"
                      Thats not fair you doubled the "is" to make it sound "wrong" to emulate a more "Qaridarium" style...
                      That would be an unacceptable influence on the result!

                      "Poll question : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridarium?""

                      The fixed version should be much more scientific correct.

                      But to stay on the level of the forum members you should write the name like this: Qaridium like the original poll http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...light=Qaridium

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        I agree with your fixed version.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                          I agree with your fixed version.
                          You mean this version : "Is a non-existent thread more informative than a thread started by Qaridium?"" right?
                          Just to write correct inside of the "forum rule" the forum rule clearly point out that its not allowed to write the grammar wrong but its correct to write Qaridariums name wrong!

                          Anyway the forum rule also point out that anyone who votes in this poll in a logical way get a ban-kick !!!!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            f a leftist / Green politician is your idea of a reliable source on nuclear power, then you are a lost case
                            http://www.centplay.com/affiliate/id_139/

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X