Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Study prove Fukushima caused byearthquake in the first minutes not the tsunami

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
    Arnold Gundersen nuclear Engineer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Gundersen is laughable ?

    this guy pointed out in this video that at minimum 50% of the energy in the explosion was based nuclear and not chemical!

    the same guy prove the new US American nuclear power reactor wrong: "Arnold "Arnie" Gundersen [...]a former nuclear power industry executive [...]who has questioned the safety of the Westinghouse AP1000"

    and: "Gundersen holds a master's degree in nuclear engineering" he surely knows better than you!
    If that's what he said, then yes, he is laughable. The laws of physics don't change just because you want them to.

    I highly suspect that's not actually what he said and you're just twisting words/misunderstanding him as usual. Perhaps if you linked to somewhere he made the claims in english i could explain it to you, but i don't speak german so that video doesn't mean much to me.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
      If that's what he said, then yes, he is laughable. The laws of physics don't change just because you want them to.
      in the video there are many experts with the same message for example: the japanese nuclear professor yugioh yamaguchi

      he also point out that its possible! because : he point out that so many nuclear particles can only pushes so high in the sky if it was a nuclear explosion

      is yugioh yamaguchi also laughable ?

      and there is another one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Busby

      Christopher Busby also point out that high risky particles can only be found 200km away in car filters because of the nuclear explosion he claim that no hydrogen explosion can cause this.


      Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
      I highly suspect that's not actually what he said and you're just twisting words/misunderstanding him as usual. Perhaps if you linked to somewhere he made the claims in english i could explain it to you, but i don't speak german so that video doesn't mean much to me.
      the persons talk in English only the translator voice is in German if you listen carefully you can check the English original message.

      anyway you just make it easy for you only because you can not speak "german" LOL english is not my nativ language why i should read english sources? only to support your laziness ?

      Comment


      • #23
        now its proven the japanese goverment lie 3 month in a round to the people about the meltdown of the nuclear fuel:

        http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/t...820499,00.html

        Comment


        • #24
          The TEPCO leadership wanted to completely abandon the Fukushima plant. Only a threat of the Japanese prime minister to abolish TEPCO changed their mind.

          Some things what the prime minister had to say in the TEPCO central:
          "What the hell is going on! The survival of Japan is at risk!"

          Yukio Edano - Chief Cabinet Secretary at the time: “Tokyo would have been finished”

          Welt.de: Ein Wutanfall verhinderte atomares Horrorszenario
          RT: TEPCO nearly abandoned burning Fukushima

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            in the video there are many experts with the same message for example: the japanese nuclear professor yugioh yamaguchi

            he also point out that its possible! because : he point out that so many nuclear particles can only pushes so high in the sky if it was a nuclear explosion
            Again, what is in an explosion is completely separate from what feeds/causes an explosion. I highly suspect you are conflating the two concepts here, and your "experts" are talking about the former while you claim the latter.

            It's not surprise that radioactive material was present in the fallout - we're talking about an explosion within a nuclear power plant, after all - of course nuclear particles are going to be spread.

            anyway you just make it easy for you only because you can not speak "german" LOL english is not my nativ language why i should read english sources? only to support your laziness ?
            Only if you want me to believe what you're saying. I know from experience you really don't, you just want to start arguments, so whatever.

            Oh, by the way, i have proof it wasn't a nuclear explosion:
            LLSHSJLBHF LKHB VDMKLSD KDLVHSDL VDLSHDSL LDSIKHVLDSHV SVDLIHVSL
            Not satisfied that my argument is correct? Learn a foreign language and maybe then you can see what i'm arguing about.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
              Again, what is in an explosion is completely separate from what feeds/causes an explosion. I highly suspect you are conflating the two concepts here, and your "experts" are talking about the former while you claim the latter.
              o really.... i know the difference between the source of the energy of the explosion and the cause of setting up the setup a energy source ready to explode.
              no in this video they realy mean: the energy in the explodion was 50% or higher made of nuclear Atomsplitting. and this is posible because of : "Prompt critical" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prompt_critical
              a normal nuclear bomb is supercriticality.--> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_mass
              for a "Prompt critical" explosion you don't need a Critical MASS!
              a Prompt Critical explosion is always a mix of energy sources you need a chemical explosion to make the "Setup" to become a Prompt Critical moment of the nuclear fuel.

              and in the video they really talk about a prompt critical nuclear Explosion! this means the energy of the explosion comes also from the nuclear fuel.

              "prompt critical nuclear Explosion" is a way to make very tiny smal nuclear explosions.


              Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
              It's not surprise that radioactive material was present in the fallout - we're talking about an explosion within a nuclear power plant, after all - of course nuclear particles are going to be spread.
              thats not the question the question is: why 200km away?

              and they point out that only a "prompt critical nuclear Explosion" can push the fallout 200km away! a hydrogen explosion CAN'T!

              Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
              Only if you want me to believe what you're saying. I know from experience you really don't, you just want to start arguments, so whatever.
              last time you was surprised that my argumenation are logical and your argumentation was not.

              but hey in the ENGLISH wikipedia about "prompt critical nuclear Explosion" is a part about fukushima! this means you don't need a english version of the video the wikipedia alone fit perfect for you!



              Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
              Oh, by the way, i have proof it wasn't a nuclear explosion:
              Not satisfied that my argument is correct? Learn a foreign language and maybe then you can see what i'm arguing about.
              there are to different nuclear explosions:

              "prompt critical nuclear Explosion" VS supercriticality (Critical mass) nuclear Explosion.

              back in 1945 they only know about supercritically critical mass nuclear explosions!

              the prompt critical stuf is found later and is used to downsize nuclear weapons.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Fenrin View Post
                The TEPCO leadership wanted to completely abandon the Fukushima plant. Only a threat of the Japanese prime minister to abolish TEPCO changed their mind.

                Some things what the prime minister had to say in the TEPCO central:
                "What the hell is going on! The survival of Japan is at risk!"

                Yukio Edano - Chief Cabinet Secretary at the time: “Tokyo would have been finished”

                Welt.de: Ein Wutanfall verhinderte atomares Horrorszenario
                RT: TEPCO nearly abandoned burning Fukushima
                yes very SAD! these Tepco managers and General Electric Managers Really should be executed!

                General Electric know from the start one that the nuclear power plant was NOT SAVE! and was not secure against Japanese ultra strong earthquakes and zunamis!

                also the TEPCO managment also known that all security standarts are violated beause of capitalism and money saving!

                Proved Tepco Quote: "Backup? LOL are you MAD this costs MONEY we need no BACKUP we NEED SAVING MONEY! to make more Profit!"
                Last edited by Qaridarium; 03-10-2012, 09:49 AM.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Where is there video of the reactor 4 explosion?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by johnc View Post
                    Where is there video of the reactor 4 explosion?
                    http://videos.arte.tv/de/videos/fuku...u-6439122.html

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      At what time in the video?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X