Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is the German economy so sucessful? Because of the Quality for All !

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by eTrune View Post
    twisting my words and using them as a way or method against me.
    hey be warned I'm pure evil this means twisting your words and use it against you are a basic character property of my personality.

    and your Logical conclusion about my basic character property is really funny : "Which off course reflects back to your sense of not being secure." because: I feel no fear i can not feel fear.
    what does "not being secure mean" anyway ?

    Originally posted by eTrune View Post
    Ok so now you way of handling my respond is changed, it seems the sense of being insecure (already appeared in your first sentence when respond to my post) become more visible.
    LOL i make fun on you and you don't get it and my handling of your respond only changed because i ALWAYS chance the handling of response because this reflects my flexibility and my creativity.

    "What a corrupted logic."

    its only corrupted because: lie to you i don't believe that an anonymous account save your anonymity. because text analysis and user Beauvoir and reactions are always limited to the "hardware/body" of the USER this means i can do connections between you and your anonymity ego. and it dosn't matter what you try to cover this.

    "Also, strange why you think that this world is it all about you. "

    i don't think this at all.

    "You don't seems to think that my other account(s) may not have any connection with you, and so, you may not know me. "

    i read maybe 80% of all phoronix posts in the forum if you write stuff i know you.

    "An opinion, doesn't need a supportive base to start with, hens the word "believe". Therefore, you point whatever it is, become irrelevant here."

    it becomes irrelevant in the same way your opinion is irrelevant...

    "Also, the word "MAD" seems not clear to me and which context you are using it now, and perhaps its not even clear to you as well. A definition from your side, would be good thing to start with."

    i used in the meaning of MAD-House

    "At the moment, I do not think you need to know such information."

    sure. the word "Need" is connected to the words: food,fuck,drink,sleep.
    but for non trivial thinkers food,fuck,drink,sleep do not have any relevance.


    "You should be that Michael, yet he still didn't ban you. Which, off course I do not supporting banning, and in same context you should be considering it as a pay back for clicking on ads. Also, if are smart you would already try to estimate the costs and how much revenue that your clicks is worth (in terms of real money) for Michael, and here is a hint, it is not worthy."

    if i want to know stuff about michael be sure i just ask. but right now i don't.

    "However, the necessity of clarifying things to you is more important than defending my words"

    be sure you can't clarifying anything to me.

    "This off course do not excuse feeding your ego by twisting my words and using them as a way or method against me."

    be sure in using eristic-dialectic you don't need any excuse to use anything against you.

    "you are feeding it loudly and publicly as well."

    (irony) Really? i didn't know this (/irony)

    "I'll be sure to save my multi-personality."

    nothing special our society force the most people into a multi-personality.
    you are ILL and MAD if you don't have multi-personalities
    many people say friendly "Hello" to neighbors and in the next second they think "what a ugly asshole"

    "you do have multi-personality as well!"

    i do have the problem in the other way around i don't have multi-personality because of this i hurt people very much. this means I'm not friendly if the society expected it.
    and i tell the truth in moments the truth isn't welcome.

    " I also, tends to think you do have some problems of comprehending and reading between the lines. "

    nothing special English is not my native language

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      hey be warned I'm pure evil this means twisting your words and use it against you are a basic character property of my personality.
      Ok, here you are pointing about a specific characteristic (you call it "evil" and I am calling it "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness"). In same way, you are affirming that you are distorting an obvious ideas and by doing such , you are turning it into something else that is not attended to do , or meant to mean it. Which I basically, I call it you are lying , to yourself in the first place and the rest in the 2nd place. //[I'll be using the fact here that you are lying, to support my points latter on]

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      and your Logical conclusion about my basic character property is really funny : "Which off course reflects back to your sense of not being secure." because: I feel no fear i can not feel fear.
      what does "not being secure mean" anyway ?
      Funny? In which sense? Shocked? It will be interesting to hear from you about this (Preferably, if its written as more than 1 sentence).
      Google for "sense of insecurity" or "emotional insecurity".

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      LOL i make fun on you and you don't get it and my handling of your respond only changed because i ALWAYS chance the handling of response because this reflects my flexibility and my creativity.
      No, it doesn't reflects your flexibility and neither your creativity of avoiding my discussion. However, it affirms the logical conclusion about the "sense of insecurity", that I mentioned already. Moreover, I may add the way you handled this situation of calling your approach as of having a sort off "flexibility" and "creativity" is supporting the false sense of security you may want to achieve. Which in itself, also supports my first conclusion.


      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      its only corrupted because: li(k)e to you i don't believe that an anonymous account save your anonymity. because text analysis and user Beauvoir and reactions are always limited to the "hardware/body" of the USER this means i can do connections between you and your anonymity ego. and it doesn't matter what you try to cover this.
      Actually, if someone wants to be anonymous he covers himself/herself rather than exposing it to public. Which also means, the behavior and reaction practiced by the user will be changed as well, specifically in an environment the user is already known at. In more details, this involves the fact that the user is not suffering from "mind-blindness" to achieve a great successes into covering his behavior and reaction. Furthermore, this leads us into supporting the fact, that I'm pretty confident you are will be able to make any correlation between my current account and any others. Ironically, it's funny to notice that you concluded that I am using a different account, only for being anonymous and reply to you ,and neglected any other logical facts.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      i don't think this at all.
      Your action and behavior says the other wise.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      i read maybe 80% of all phoronix posts in the forum if you write stuff i know you.
      [sarcism] Right... [/sarcsim]

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      it becomes irrelevant in the same way your opinion is irrelevant...
      Please go on, and tell me how it becomes irrelevant? Or you can't?

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      i used in the meaning of MAD-House
      Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      sure. the word "Need" is connected to the words: food,fuck,drink,sleep.
      but for non trivial thinkers food,fuck,drink,sleep do not have any relevance.
      The word "need", having a priority of orders. You can't go to the 2nd priority without fulfilling some of the 1st priority as of the nature of orders. The topic around "necessity" is so big, that I'll leave it right now, for some other time. As, you seems to understand why you don't need to know such information.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      if i want to know stuff about michael be sure i just ask. but right now i don't.
      In other words, you claim of something, you tells everyone the result of what originally didn't think about it. And from above, I can see you are refusing to think about it and neither you are attending to get a supportive fact to your claims.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      be sure you can't clarifying anything to me.
      Too general and too abroad, and so meaningless statement that came from you.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      be sure in using eristic-dialectic you don't need any excuse to use anything against you.
      I strongly agree that this applies to you.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      (irony) Really? i didn't know this (/irony)
      By reading the word "irony", it appears that you already get pride of showing your ego.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      nothing special our society force the most people into a multi-personality.
      I remind you, you originally claimed that I do have multi-personality. As when you said: "...really you must have some kind of multiple personals...".
      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      you are ILL and MAD if you don't have multi-personalities
      Only in your mind.
      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      many people say friendly "Hello" to neighbors and in the next second they think "what a ugly asshole"
      Only in your mind.
      Hint: you can't hear the voices in their head.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      i do have the problem in the other way around i don't have multi-personality because of this i hurt people very much. this means I'm not friendly if the society expected it.
      You are contradicting yourself too much. This means you could have multi-personality ,and that's you aren't aware about it.

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      and i tell the truth in moments the truth isn't welcome.
      You need to differentiate between "hypocrisy" and "multi-personality".

      Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
      nothing special English is not my native language
      Use a dictionary.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Ok, here you are pointing about a specific characteristic (you call it "evil" and I am calling it "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness").
        what is a "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness" ?? maybe my evilness isn't evil enough for you?

        anyway there are many specific characteristics for my personality and "cheap" only fits if you count yourself as the reward... yes very cheap i think next time i go into a McDonald's restaurant and talk to the hamburger selling guy about his sperm in the hamburger sandwich maybe the reward is higher

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        In same way, you are affirming that you are distorting an obvious ideas and by doing such , you are turning it into something else that is not attended to do , or meant to mean it.
        turning stuff into something else is very creative! and i really don't understand your disappointment you get what you deserve. Maybe work a little harder then maybe you get it double time.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Which I basically, I call it you are lying , to yourself in the first place and the rest in the 2nd place. //[I'll be using the fact here that you are lying, to support my points latter on]
        first of all lying is intelligence if you can't lie you are dump as hell.
        I am honored to be designated as a liar

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Funny? In which sense? Shocked? It will be interesting to hear from you about this (Preferably, if its written as more than 1 sentence).
        Google for "sense of insecurity" or "emotional insecurity".
        sure Fun but maybe you don't share my kind of fun.
        what about emotional insecurity for a human without emotional reactions?

        its funny because you talk about emotions and MY emotions but what is if there are no emotions?

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        No, it doesn't reflects your flexibility and neither your creativity of avoiding my discussion.
        avoiding your discussion? in your dreams the only funny part is you think i do have emotions.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        However, it affirms the logical conclusion about the "sense of insecurity", that I mentioned already. Moreover, I may add the way you handled this situation of calling your approach as of having a sort off "flexibility" and "creativity" is supporting the false sense of security you may want to achieve. Which in itself, also supports my first conclusion.
        i just kidding about your conclusions because i do not have emotions. my illness burns all emotions in my brain.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Actually, if someone wants to be anonymous he covers himself/herself rather than exposing it to public. Which also means, the behavior and reaction practiced by the user will be changed as well, specifically in an environment the user is already known at. In more details, this involves the fact that the user is not suffering from "mind-blindness" to achieve a great successes into covering his behavior and reaction. Furthermore, this leads us into supporting the fact, that I'm pretty confident you are will be able to make any correlation between my current account and any others. Ironically, it's funny to notice that you concluded that I am using a different account, only for being anonymous and reply to you ,and neglected any other logical facts.
        first of all humans are not logical. i'm sure your "eTrune" account is a trash account because you can't write with me without trashing your account.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Your action and behavior says the other wise.
        i'm not very linear this means you are naive if you think you can know my thinking by dragging my actions and behavior.

        Behaviorism as a concept is just dump. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism


        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Please go on, and tell me how it becomes irrelevant? Or you can't?
        your Trivial way of thinking means for example your Behaviorism proves your irrelevancy


        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.
        MAD-HOUSE is not a definition if you do not have any creativity and no imagination.
        but for me if i want watch MAD people i go into a MAD-House.

        Be in the MAD-House is the Definition of being MAD.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        The word "need", having a priority of orders. You can't go to the 2nd priority without fulfilling some of the 1st priority as of the nature of orders. The topic around "necessity" is so big, that I'll leave it right now, for some other time. As, you seems to understand why you don't need to know such information.
        'NEED' for humans is not the same as need for computers or animals the word need for humans is a more abstract word this means if i think i need it then i need it without your permission to need it. The will to need something is the prove to need something.

        but yes you already think like an animal in your Behaviorism because only in the Behaviorism the word need is used in the way a computer need electricity.

        Behaviorism is just dump!

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        In other words, you claim of something, you tells everyone the result of what originally didn't think about it. And from above, I can see you are refusing to think about it and neither you are attending to get a supportive fact to your claims.
        its much more simple here i just don't care ! i don't care about the opinion of michael or anybody else.

        if he deletes my account how cares?
        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Too general and too abroad, and so meaningless statement that came from you.
        meaningless? what you are not happy about my nihilism?

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        I strongly agree that this applies to you.
        you surprised me now i'm evil or not? because only evil humans use eristic-dialectic against you without any reason.

        but sure i'm not evil i'm a "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness"

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        By reading the word "irony", it appears that you already get pride of showing your ego.
        I define my success not over my ego. I define it over: how much damage the opposite takes

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        I remind you, you originally claimed that I do have multi-personality. As when you said: "...really you must have some kind of multiple personals...".
        and what is wrong with my claim? i still think this.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Only in your mind.
        a human with full mental health always plays rolls this means if you get a gun and a uniform you act a Soldier or a Police officer if you get a judge robe you act a judge
        only naive people think they chose how they act.
        imagine this: you do have a weapon in your hand and someone shot at you do you shot back? why do you think you need to shot back? to save your life? in real the other person only shot at you because he want to save his life and your weapon in your hand is the source of this reaction. a mom acting a mom and a child acting a child. and a man acting a man.
        if you chance something they chance there action performance.

        studies show this if you say to a teacher he teaches now a high IQ skilled class the teacher really think its a high skilled class but if you say to the teacher he teaches a low level dump class he really think they are dump even they have a average IQ of 130+

        people change their personality as soon as you can send them commands.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        Hint: you can't hear the voices in their head.
        But they can tell me about it

        and many do! this means most humans life in a double standard life with double life and double face.

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        You are contradicting yourself too much. This means you could have multi-personality ,and that's you aren't aware about it.
        I'm always rude in the same way

        Originally posted by eTrune View Post
        You need to differentiate between "hypocrisy" and "multi-personality".
        for me hypocrisy is a kind of multi-personality
        and hypocrisy-multi-personality is the normal way to be in our society

        "Use a dictionary. "

        i always do.

        Comment


        • #79
          Easy, man

          Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
          "Use a dictionary. "

          i always do.
          Using books to wedge furnitures doesn't count

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            maybe my evilness isn't evil enough for you?
            Evilness? you mean your "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness" symptom that you claim that you don't have it?
            Oh sure, yes it isn't enought in anyway you are going to look at it.

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            anyway there are many specific characteristics for my personality and "cheap" only fits if you count yourself as the reward... yes very cheap i think next time i go into a McDonald's restaurant and talk to the hamburger selling guy about his sperm in the hamburger sandwich maybe the reward is higher
            So, you counting yourself as a reward of an outcome of cheapness? This way, you specifying your personality characteristics by bonding to this and so, you should know that in McDonald's every single employee having different job to do.However, I'll not going to stop you from asking for sperms in your hamburger. I'll even remind you that there are people who buys sperm. In this way, you should be considering yourself so luck if anyone gave you his sperm to eat it. In other words, feeding you with money (sperms).

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            turning stuff into something else is very creative! and i really don't understand your disappointment you get what you deserve. Maybe work a little harder then maybe you get it double time.
            It is not a disappointing that you can't differentiate between having creativeness and lacking it. In this case, we are talking about the lack of it as the point here refers to you. Don't worry, if you work hard and hard enough you will be able to realize that you are lacking creativity ,and to be more specific, you aren't able to measure it in a real world scale that anyone will consider it a creativity. Still, this doesn't involve the false nature of your claim about creativeness.

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            first of all lying is intelligence if you can't lie you are dump as hell.
            Or it can be considered as an honorable thing, right?
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            I am honored to be designated as a liar
            First you are honored, so you are feeling and we know that's an emotion. //I'll be using this point later on. Also, by saying "liar" it is possible to reference it back to contradicting the reality. So, you are contradicting yourself. Which can be declared as it caused by unstable emotional status.

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            sure Fun but maybe you don't share my kind of fun.
            Not sharing the current emotional status you called as "fun"? Could be, or even it might be not funny at all.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            what about emotional insecurity for a human without emotional reactions?
            its funny because you talk about emotions and MY emotions but what is if there are no emotions?
            So, you are saying you aren't emotional at all?
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            avoiding your discussion? in your dreams the only funny part is you think i do have emotions.
            Oh, here you are confirming that you don't have any emotions.
            Well, lets start by saying you felt of being "honored" and considered an action which isn't funny as of being "fun"-ny, you may scroll up read about the references.. Also, by this you are contradicting yourself. By claiming you know yourself, however you don't. This is proven here, and it can be considered as a fact.
            [QUOTE=Qaridarium;253269]i just kidding about your conclusions because i do not have emotions. my illness burns all emotions in my brain.]]
            Hmm, anther lie made by you. Could be explained that it makes you feel better about yourself ("sense of insecurity"), or even seeking other people's emotion of feeling pathetic about you. Even, your first word is "kidding", which is a word that describes a joy (an emotion), which confirm your statement as big lie (to yourself in the first place).
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            first of all humans are not logical. i'm sure your "eTrune" account is a trash account because you can't write with me without trashing your account.
            World is not running all about you. I'll skip further discussion about this, as you can read my previous reply's for this part of argument.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            i'm not very linear this means you are naive if you think you can know my thinking by dragging my actions and behavior.
            I'm pretty sure you aren't, however your behavior describes you more.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            your Trivial way of thinking means for example your Behaviorism proves your irrelevancy
            Still, I'm waiting for an explanation and not your opinion on none related matter.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            Be in the MAD-House is the Definition of being MAD.
            I said it, and I'll repeat it. Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            'NEED' for humans is not the same as need for computers or animals the word need for humans is a more abstract word
            So, you are agreeing to my argument around "need"-ing. However, you consider it as an abstract.
            As, I already clarified the word "need" for you. I'll leave you to read about "Maslow's hierarchy of needs". Read it, first then we will talk about needing.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            ...this means if i think i need it then i need it without your permission to need it. The will to need something is the prove to need something.
            Wrong, also I'll reffernce you back to "Maslow's hierarchy of needs".
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            but yes you already think like an animal in your Behaviorism because only in the Behaviorism the word need is used in the way a computer need electricity.
            Behaviorism is just dump!
            Scroll up, and read that you called your actions as in "Behaviorism". Now, you call it dump. Therefore, your action is dump and can be considered as you are dump.

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            its much more simple here i just don't care ! i don't care about the opinion of michael or anybody else.
            Actually, you do.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            if he deletes my account how cares?
            You will care. Remeber your behavior and actions prove it. Also, your "emotional insecurity" does.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            what you are not happy about my nihilism?
            You are not showing any valuable observation of nihilism effect or any appearances about it. So it can't be a reason for your claim. //You can scroll down to see an obvious prove that came out from you.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            only evil humans use eristic-dialectic against you without any reason.
            Go ahead and prove it.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            but sure i'm not evil i'm a "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness"
            We defined both terms as an equal in your case, now your denying one while approve the anther. Glade, you start knowing yourself even more. This is one step in the right direction.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            I define my success not over my ego. I define it over: how much damage the opposite takes
            I can't see how this valid. You turn on the T.V. and you see on news a massive earthquake that acquired, just after you turned on the T.V. This is not a success, this means you are dreaming. So, wake up.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            and what is wrong with my claim? i still think this.
            Your claim is about what, and on which base you are basing your claim on?
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            a human with full mental health always plays rolls this means if you get a gun and a uniform you act a Soldier or a Police officer if you get a judge robe you act a judge
            No, you don't. The reality doesn't support your statement above ,and neither, rationality does.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            only naive people think they chose how they act.
            You are now being naive, by taking the above statement and apply extremely around people.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            imagine this: you do have a weapon in your hand and someone shot at you do you shot back? why do you think you need to shot back? to save your life? in real the other person only shot at you because he want to save his life and your weapon in your hand is the source of this reaction.
            No one does this. Also, if you want to consider shooting reasons, you will need to go into economical reasons and to base this around scarcity as an example.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            a mom acting a mom and a child acting a child. and a man acting a man.
            Hmm, nihilism you said earlier. I'll leave the above statement undiscussed in case you want to change it later on. Which I do believe you will for variety reasons or maybe not.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            studies show this if you say to a teacher he teaches now a high IQ skilled class the teacher really think its a high skilled class but if you say to the teacher he teaches a low level dump class he really think they are dump even they have a average IQ of 130+
            Before I look to this seriously and as you claimed the studies show, I am asking where is your resource?

            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            most humans life in a double standard life with double life and double face.
            Give me an example with more explanation, so I can understand your concept more clearly.
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            I'm always rude in the same way
            This is not a right respond to my reply, and it doesn't have any relation to it. As when you tell someone: "good morning" ,and he replys you back: "Creamy is always sour in rainbow's shadow".
            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
            hypocrisy-multi-personality is the normal way to be in our society
            How is so?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by jlm2010 View Post
              Using books to wedge furnitures doesn't count

              yes very lovely but I'm allergic against weed so i prefer GBL or LSD

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by jlm2010 View Post
                Using books to wedge furnitures doesn't count

                heyy i just have a question: "Using books to wedge furnitures doesn't count " why? it is smart to use books in a useful way!

                in other words: books are obsolete i read ebooks/websites on my PC.

                burning books in your oven in winter is a usefull way to use books

                Comment


                • #83
                  Smart, really ?

                  Because, as smart as you are, you could not figure that if you use your dictionary/books to wedge furnitures or burn them in the oven, you can't use them to learn/correct your faults/grammar

                  How was it ? ha yes, I remember ... "It's not because you can speak, that you are smart/intelligent"

                  Or this one, it's a matter of personal choice :
                  "Light travels faster than sound, it's the reason why some people look brilliant, until they speak"

                  Think of it

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by jlm2010 View Post
                    Because, as smart as you are, you could not figure that if you use your dictionary/books to wedge furnitures or burn them in the oven, you can't use them to learn/correct your faults/grammar

                    How was it ? ha yes, I remember ... "It's not because you can speak, that you are smart/intelligent"

                    Or this one, it's a matter of personal choice :
                    "Light travels faster than sound, it's the reason why some people look brilliant, until they speak"

                    Think of it
                    you make a big mistake here: i can figure that out if i use my dictionary books to wedge furnitures and burning it in my oven.

                    i can do this because i use wikipedia and wiktionary and google. no one need books anymore!

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Evilness? you mean your "cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness" symptom that you claim that you don't have it?
                      Oh sure, yes it isn't enought in anyway you are going to look at it.
                      i really wondering myself were i wrote this? i already wrote: if you are the reward yes then i'm cheap. and so one.

                      also being evil is relative i killed a ant today so I'm relative evil to the and or not?

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      So, you counting yourself as a reward of an outcome of cheapness?
                      can you quote me i'm saying this? not really i talk about you are my "reward"
                      and i'm ""cheap-twisted-reality-chicken-egoness"" if you are the reward and you prove this by being my reward.
                      you are the ultimate punishment LOL!

                      in other words you do a Self-fulfilling prophecy and you now go after me to make sure your prophecy comes true LOL

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      This way, you specifying your personality characteristics by bonding to this and so, you should know that in McDonald's every single employee having different job to do.However, I'll not going to stop you from asking for sperms in your hamburger.
                      i write about the reward of the question not the "sperm"

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      I'll even remind you that there are people who buys sperm. In this way, you should be considering yourself so luck if anyone gave you his sperm to eat it. In other words, feeding you with money (sperms).
                      now i get it the spam about Viagra is about eating sperm!!!


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      It is not a disappointing that you can't differentiate between having creativeness and lacking it. In this case, we are talking about the lack of it as the point here refers to you.
                      maybe i only do not have creativeness because your definition about this only is about eating sperm ??

                      maybe you think I'm full of great creativeness if i start eating your sperm ?


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Don't worry, if you work hard and hard enough you will be able to realize that you are lacking creativity ,and to be more specific, you aren't able to measure it in a real world scale that anyone will consider it a creativity. Still, this doesn't involve the false nature of your claim about creativeness.
                      Work will never bring you any understanding or realizing.

                      Work blocks your thinking and the only you will get out of work is more sperm in your asshole.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Or it can be considered as an honorable thing, right?
                      if you do it to protect people or the feeling of people yes.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      First you are honored, so you are feeling and we know that's an emotion. //I'll be using this point later on. Also, by saying "liar" it is possible to reference it back to contradicting the reality. So, you are contradicting yourself. Which can be declared as it caused by unstable emotional status.
                      for me "Honor" is not a emotion. o can explain the function of honor with 100% pure rationality.
                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Not sharing the current emotional status you called as "fun"? Could be, or even it might be not funny at all.
                      Fun for me is not the same as fun for other people. for me fun is a logical function.

                      and if its logical then its not an emotion.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      So, you are saying you aren't emotional at all?
                      my emotionality is very rare.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      World is not running all about you. I'll skip further discussion about this, as you can read my previous reply's for this part of argument.
                      where I said that each?


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      however your behavior describes you more.
                      really only US people believe in behaviorism.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Still, I'm waiting for an explanation and not your opinion on none related matter.
                      i read and write about Behaviorism weeks ago for a friend.
                      and all informations about Behaviorism i read about this was just bullshit from brainless people.
                      its biased because of the observer personality.

                      this was the text i read last about behaviorism : http://arbeitsblaetter.stangl-taller...iorismus.shtml

                      the logical conclusion is dramatic for the Behaviorism believers.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      I said it, and I'll repeat it. Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.
                      for me "being in a MAD-House" is the only logical definition of being mad! all other definitions are just Arbitrariness.



                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      So, you are agreeing to my argument around "need"-ing. However, you consider it as an abstract.
                      As, I already clarified the word "need" for you. I'll leave you to read about "Maslow's hierarchy of needs". Read it, first then we will talk about needing.

                      Wrong, also I'll reffernce you back to "Maslow's hierarchy of needs".
                      just NO! your definition for "Need" only works for lower animals.

                      do a human need food? NO because of: suicide
                      do a human need water ? NO because of: suicide
                      do the human need sex and childs? NO because of collective suicide.

                      suicide is a valid "NEED" without being in your "Maslow's hierarchy"

                      some people NEED suicide so much they do all for it!


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Scroll up, and read that you called your actions as in "Behaviorism". Now, you call it dump. Therefore, your action is dump and can be considered as you are dump.
                      o yes im sure Behaviorism is really for dump people.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Actually, you do.
                      You will care. Remeber your behavior and actions prove it. Also, your "emotional insecurity" does.
                      you know more about myself than i do? LOL... and again th dump Behaviorism..LOL


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      You are not showing any valuable observation of nihilism effect or any appearances about it. So it can't be a reason for your claim. //You can scroll down to see an obvious prove that came out from you.
                      wow more breaking news about myself... hey Behaviorism is for dump! people with a deeper understanding of my personality know about my nihilism.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      We defined both terms as an equal in your case, now your denying one while approve the anther. Glade, you start knowing yourself even more. This is one step in the right direction.
                      equal? evil or not evil this is the question.


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      I can't see how this valid. You turn on the T.V. and you see on news a massive earthquake that acquired, just after you turned on the T.V. This is not a success, this means you are dreaming. So, wake up.
                      i define my success over your confusion : "I can't see how this valid." sure you can't see it because you are confused. and you are so confused you fail to write a sentence? in my point of view the valid version of your sentence is: "I can't see how this is valid."


                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      No, you don't. The reality doesn't support your statement above ,and neither, rationality does.

                      Whose reality? your reality ?

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Before I look to this seriously and as you claimed the studies show, I am asking where is your resource?
                      searching my source i read is really a to big time burner.

                      and the other problem is... if i give you a german source you can't read it. for example: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...sb1_XthbvzAB-A

                      Qaridarium: "most humans life in a double standard life with double life and double face."
                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      Give me an example with more explanation, so I can understand your concept more clearly.
                      its not my concept. but wikipedia helps you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
                      http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geheimes_Doppelleben

                      2 examples of humans with full mental health and no they are not ill because they have a secret double life and they use double standard.

                      Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                      This is not a right respond to my reply,
                      Right/Wrong is just a moralistic double thinking.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        i really wondering myself were i wrote this? i already wrote: if you are the reward yes then i'm cheap. and so one.
                        Actions speaking louder than words. On the other hand, you can also consider the fact, because you are cheap subject, you become a reward.

                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        also being evil is relative i killed a ant today so I'm relative evil to the and or not?
                        Not really, you are to the ant as natural cause that occurred. The same as a lion walking on the streets (freely) and killed you. Now, would you consider in this situation that the lion is an evil?

                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        can you quote me i'm saying this? not really i talk about you are my "reward"
                        I already mentioned that actions speaks louder than words. However, it is possible to consider you as a reward as well.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        if you are the reward and you prove this by being my reward.
                        I hardly can see where this applies.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        you are the ultimate punishment LOL!
                        How so? I didn't punish you in anyway.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        in other words you do a Self-fulfilling prophecy and you now go after me to make sure your prophecy comes true LOL
                        The question would be then, what is the prophecy? What is this prophecy that you claim you know it?
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        i write about the reward of the question not the "sperm"
                        It might sound like you are referring to the sperm. As, I already said, I'll not be stopping you from obtaining "sperm"-'s.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        now i get it the spam about Viagra is about eating sperm!!!
                        No, Sildenafil Citrate and Sperm are different things. One is about the outcome and other about supporting the causing factor.
                        One more thing, try eating sperms ,and tell us if this prove the conclusion,you just came out of "viagra is about eating sperm".
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        ... i only do not have creativeness ...
                        It is hard to accept the truth, but your half way right.
                        Keep it up.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        maybe you think I'm full of great creativeness if i start eating your sperm ?
                        I am currently not marketing it, but I am not guaranteeing anything to you. However, if you are interested in buying the sperms (with Euro or USD), I'll be providing you with such medicine.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        Work will never bring you any understanding or realizing.
                        Pure none sense. You don't even distinguish between mental work & physical work. So, it more clear that any understanding or realizing from your part, won't be an easy task for you.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        Work blocks your thinking and the only you will get out of work is more sperm in your asshole.
                        So your idea about unblocking your thoughts is by working your ass more?
                        Also, about your magic medicine would you like to digest it normally, or you prefer it to be injected directly? According to you, this is the right way of unblocking your thinking and by that, you would be able to practice: understanding, realizing and having some creativeness.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        if you do it to protect people or the feeling of people yes.
                        Anther sense of truestic is appearing directly in your comments , without covering it.
                        Keep it up.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        for me "Honor" is not a emotion. o can explain the function of honor with 100% pure rationality.
                        Feel free to do so.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        Fun for me is not the same as fun for other people. for me fun is a logical function.
                        Fine, prove it to me. Go ahead and write the function.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        my emotionality is very rare.
                        Here you are also contradicting yourself, you already said you aren't contradicting yourself. However, you claimed your didn't have any emotion and now it just apear you have an emotion.
                        Keep it up,and everyone might know you are sensitive towards your emotions.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        where I said that each?
                        You implied in what you said.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        really only US people believe in behaviorism.
                        Leave alone the US people. You still didn't prove anything wrong of "behaviorism". More over, scroll down to get about behaviorism.

                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        ... and all informations about Behaviorism i read about this was just bullshit from brainless people.
                        its biased because of the observer personality.
                        this was the text i read last about behaviorism : http://arbeitsblaetter.stangl-taller...iorismus.shtml
                        the logical conclusion is dramatic for the Behaviorism believers.
                        The concultion was, "Gescheitert ist der Behaviorismus auch nicht bei der Erklärung der Phänomene des Lernens, sondern eher durch seinen Anspruch, alle Formen des Lernens erklären und dadurch initiieren und steuern zu können." It doesn't support anything you just said. I'll leave you to quote something exact that supports your claims, before replying to you in this matter.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        for me "being in a MAD-House" is the only logical definition of being mad! all other definitions are just Arbitrariness.
                        I am also going to repeat myself again. Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        just NO! your definition for "Need" only works for lower animals.
                        It doesn't. I already referenced you back to "Maslow's hierarchy of needs". Despite asking you to understand, you seems not willing to read "Maslow's hierarchy of needs".

                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        do a human need food? NO because of: suicide
                        do a human need water ? NO because of: suicide
                        do the human need sex and childs? NO because of collective suicide.
                        Purely illogical nonsense. Which arise us to a question, would you suicide?

                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        suicide is a valid "NEED" without being in your "Maslow's hierarchy"
                        some people NEED suicide so much they do all for it!
                        It is not a "NEED", it can be considered as matter of sickness. Do you need to be sick? That the question.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        yes im sure Behaviorism is really for dump people.
                        Which reflects back to you.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        you know more about myself than i do? LOL... and again th dump Behaviorism..LOL
                        The first part, I didn't get it. I'll agree that you are dump. If this will makes you feel better.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        wow more breaking news about myself... hey Behaviorism is for dump! people with a deeper understanding of my personality know about my nihilism.
                        Contradicting yourself here again, and trying to cover it with the claim of "deeper understanding of" yourself.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        equal? evil or not evil this is the question.
                        No, that's not the question. It's already been answered in your case.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        i define my success over your confusion : "I can't see how this valid." sure you can't see it because you are confused. and you are so confused you fail to write a sentence? in my point of view the valid version of your sentence is: "I can't see how this is valid."
                        It was an smoothing sentence (after, it turned out you that you have a sensitive emotional). Which was meant not to heart your feeling. It's purpose was to get your views on that matter. Therefore, there is nothing to be confused about, despite how strange it made you confused by dropping "is" as an typo. Specifically, if your ideas flooding faster than your physical typing speed. If this an evident, it show how depressed you are for attacking me personally, than the sound of my ideas. I'll be considering how your "fun function" will applies here. Moreover, this doesn't excuse you from running away from replying to the argument.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        Whose reality? your reality ?
                        The reality where truth is an absolute, and can't be confused by.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        searching my source i read is really a to big time burner.
                        and the other problem is... if i give you a german source you can't read it. for example: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...sb1_XthbvzAB-A
                        I won't mind to take your sources. It is also interesting that your source is using aspects from "behaviorism" in explaining the results and the facts. Like in "... Verhalten als auch für Underachievement gelten kann ...". So, is this anther contradiction from you, using a source to support you, and you don't take it. Despite that, I find your source's conclusion is interesting.
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        its not my concept. but wikipedia helps you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
                        http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geheimes_Doppelleben

                        2 examples of humans with full mental health and no they are not ill because they have a secret double life and they use double standard.
                        You answered only the part of "double standard", yet you didn't answer about "double life and double face".
                        Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                        Right/Wrong is just a moralistic double thinking.
                        Then my answer to you is this:

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Actions speaking louder than words. On the other hand, you can also consider the fact, because you are cheap subject, you become a reward.
                          und nochmal welche aktion?

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Not really, you are to the ant as natural cause that occurred. The same as a lion walking on the streets (freely) and killed you. Now, would you consider in this situation that the lion is an evil?
                          the lion is not evil because: he eat what he kills verdammt schon wieder englisch.. ja er ist was er tötet ich aber bin böse weil ich habe die amaise nur zu meiner belustigung getötet und weil sie mich störte.


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          I already mentioned that actions speaks louder than words. However, it is possible to consider you as a reward as well.
                          also bitte welche aktion?? bewertest du meine kalt runtergetippelten worte hier etwa als aktion ? ich würde sowieso auf die selbe art und weiße tippeln völlig egal was.
                          aber ist klar das du das was es ist nicht als das sieht was es ist sondern du dir was einbildest was es sein sollte.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Pure none sense. You don't even distinguish between mental work & physical work. So, it more clear that any understanding or realizing from your part, won't be an easy task for you.
                          if you force your braun to do mental work then it is the same like physical work.

                          only free thinking and the full freedom of choice of your thinking are the true way.

                          so eine scheiße und schon wieder schreib ich Englisch so eine säuche echt.


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Fine, prove it to me. Go ahead and write the function.
                          the function is: elimination of the boring long time.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Here you are also contradicting yourself, you already said you aren't contradicting yourself. However, you claimed your didn't have any emotion and now it just apear you have an emotion.
                          Keep it up,and everyone might know you are sensitive towards your emotions.
                          um zu beweisen das ich mich widerspreche müsstest du mir emotionen in meiem INNEREN nachweisen was du aber unmöglich kannst das einzige was du siehst ist das was ich nach ausen hin spiele und dir zeige wie ein schauspieler.


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Leave alone the US people. You still didn't prove anything wrong of "behaviorism". More over, scroll down to get about behaviorism.
                          Der supjektive betrachtungswinkel eines Forschers der das verhalten von anderen supjekten beobachtet führt niemals zu einem opjektiven erkenntnissgewinn. Und deswegen ist die verhaltensforschung die nur auf das bemerkte verhalten als quelle abzielt schwachsinn.


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          The concultion was, "Gescheitert ist der Behaviorismus auch nicht bei der Erklärung der Phänomene des Lernens, sondern eher durch seinen Anspruch, alle Formen des Lernens erklären und dadurch initiieren und steuern zu können." It doesn't support anything you just said. I'll leave you to quote something exact that supports your claims, before replying to you in this matter.
                          Da kann aber einer KEIN Deutsch denn das wort "Gescheitert" macht die begründung wieso es denn Gescheitert ist nur irrelevanten nebensache. Zudem habe ich auch nie gesagt das ausgerechnet diese stümperhafte schüler information meine aussage untermauern soll nein selbs in dieser schüler information wird in deutschland gesagt das es Gescheitert ist was nichts anderes bedeutet als das es schwachsinn ist.

                          aber um dir aus diesem text ein text inhalt zu zeigen was meiner meinung nach noch am nächsten an meiner meinung liegt dann nenne ich dir das hier: "Wie subtil solche kulturellen Differenzen hineinreichen können bis in das Design des psychologischen Tierexperiments, hat Bertrand Russel (wahrscheinlich bezogen auf Skinners Tauben und Köhlers Primaten) wie folgt in humorvoller Weise kolportiert: "Versuchstiere von amerikanischen Behavioristen verhielten sich wie Amerikaner: sie rannten herum in beinahe zufälliger Weise, während die von Deutschen sich wie Deutsche verhielten: sie saßen da und dachten nach.""

                          und nun übersetze ich dir die pointe sogar auf englisch das auch du das verstehst: American experimental animals act like Americans they run chaotic and randomly around without sense and in the big difference the german experimental animals they act like germans They sat and pondered like Philosophers.

                          in other words: American Behaviorism believers are clueless chaotics!



                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          I am also going to repeat myself again. Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why.
                          ja seltsam das ich Irrenhaus als definition anerkenne denn verrückt ist man ja nicht wenn man verrückt ist sondern solang die geselschaft das toll findet oder selbst daran erkrankt ist ist ja alles ok sondern nein verrückt ist man erst wenn man in einem irranhaus ist entweder freiwillig oder eben unfreiwillig.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Purely illogical nonsense. Which arise us to a question, would you suicide?
                          o man you call it illogical nonsense i call it :"Discordianism,Chaos,Nihilism,Solipsism "

                          the need of Suicide is so important because of the Freedom of Choice es ist eben extrem wichtig das man die freie wahl hat zu leben oder eben aufgrund deines eigenen willen zu sterben. und ja ich wechsle die sprache da ich dir ja versprochen habe das du nur noch deutsch abbekommst ich aber aus automatismus gründen ständig ins englische wechsle LOL sooo gehirngewaschen bin ich schon von der englischen sprach probaganda.


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          It is not a "NEED", it can be considered as matter of sickness. Do you need to be sick? That the question.
                          be sure Suicide is a human "NEED" because this makes us humans! only stupid animals do not have need for suicide.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          Contradicting yourself here again, and trying to cover it with the claim of "deeper understanding of" yourself.
                          really you should get a deeper understanding.

                          if you ask about my believing systems then i answer you: Discordianism,Chaos,Nihilism,Solipsism


                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          It was an smoothing sentence (after, it turned out you that you have a sensitive emotional). Which was meant not to heart your feeling. It's purpose was to get your views on that matter. Therefore, there is nothing to be confused about, despite how strange it made you confused by dropping "is" as an typo. Specifically, if your ideas flooding faster than your physical typing speed. If this an evident, it show how depressed you are for attacking me personally, than the sound of my ideas. I'll be considering how your "fun function" will applies here. Moreover, this doesn't excuse you from running away from replying to the argument.
                          no you don't get it for me as an pure Logical human the word "is" was essential
                          and it was really a problem for me reading your sentence without the "is"
                          call it autism but for me your sentence without the is was just broken...

                          this part is also broken: "(after, it turned out you that you have a sensitive emotional)"
                          in my point of view you should write this like this: (after, it turned out of you that you have a sensitive emotionality) or not?

                          anyway i know that i don't have a sensitive emotionality I'm more like a bulldozer with a flamethrower burning all down.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          The reality where truth is an absolute, and can't be confused by.
                          Es gibt keine Realität sowie es keine Wahrheit gibt genauso-wenig gibt es eine Absolute Sache.

                          "verwirrt" ist das einzige wort in deinem satz wo keine lüge ist. "confused" is the only word in your sentence without a lie Discordianism,Chaos,Nihilism,Solipsism are more valid than all your fake words.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          I won't mind to take your sources. It is also interesting that your source is using aspects from "behaviorism" in explaining the results and the facts. Like in "... Verhalten als auch für Underachievement gelten kann ...". So, is this anther contradiction from you, using a source to support you, and you don't take it. Despite that, I find your source's conclusion is interesting.
                          Wie nur konntest du nicht bemerken das mein link nicht meine quelle war?
                          Davon abgesehen bemerke ich wirklich das du wirklich stolz bist auf deine kenntnisse über die Verhaltensforschung und das dass sich daraus gebildete Pseudonym-wissenschaftliche-Glaubenskonstrukt.

                          Wieso es Pseudowissenschaftlich ist ist simpel weil die Verhaltensforschung davon ausgeht das der Beobachter Blickwinkel das Ergebnis nicht beeinflusst meine studie aber ging exakt um diesen Blickwinkel du bekommst andere Resultate wenn du einen anderen Blickwinkel einforderst in deinen untersuchungsmetoden.

                          Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                          You answered only the part of "double standard", yet you didn't answer about "double life and double face".
                          Seltsam du akzeptierst also den englischen Artikel in der Wikipedia wo es darum geht was der doppelte standart bedeutet du ignorierst aber den Wikipedia Artikel wo das Doppelleben erläutert wird und das nur weil er auf deutsch ist und du nichts verstehst ?
                          und dann willst du auch noch eine Erklärung für ein doppeltes Gesicht was du doch sowieso wieder nicht verstehen würdest.
                          und du reagierst auch keinen Millimeter bezüglich dem doppelten Standard dieser nämlich widerlegt dich eindeutig! der beweist nämlich das alle Menschen und dinge je nach Blickwinkel eine andere Bedeutung bekommen und man die eigenen ideale eben nur aus einem bestimmten Blickwinkel heraus überhaupt gut heist und aus einem anderen Blickwinkel heraus verwehrt man sich diesen idealen.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            *sigh*, I replied you back in PM. That I'll ignore whatever you said if it's written in German. You seems to consider this an easy way to get out ,and so you did.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            und nochmal welche aktion?
                            All the actions that's been acted by you. So, whatever you do and react is basically what I mean, and it isn't limited by that.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            the lion is not evil because: he eat what he kills verdammt schon wieder englisch.. ja er ist was er tötet ich aber bin böse weil ich habe die amaise nur zu meiner belustigung getötet und weil sie mich störte.
                            You seems you don't have any problem with experiencing, you actually managed to write in English than tranfer it in German.
                            Sure, so the lion isn't evil ,because it eats what it kills, right? Whats about the other animals that kills you without eatting you? Let say for an example, an elephan killed you by sitting on you. Will you consider in this example that the elephant is an evil animal?
                            About your crime, what did you kill? An ant? This is wont make you an evil, as I told you it is similar to the elephant example.
                            [QUOTE=Qaridarium;253564]also bitte welche aktion?? bewertest du meine kalt runtergetippelten worte hier etwa als aktion ? ich würde sowieso auf die selbe art und weiße tippeln völlig egal was.
                            By "aktion", I mean the behavior and your act and what you do in responding. I hope this clear enough for you to understand. Like when I told you if you spoke in German then I am not going to reply back to you. What you did is you wrote in German for many reasons.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            aber ist klar das du das was es ist nicht als das sieht was es ist sondern du dir was einbildest was es sein sollte.
                            It would be right ,if the evidents are invisible or they don't exist. However, when you can notice something in front of you, you can't consider this as imagining. Gravity for example, it is true you can't see it, but you can sense its effect. Throwing an apple up ,and noticing it gets down by gravity force. Or the way the moon circulate around the Earth are few examples. However, imagining something without a pure evident can not be considered as a realistic matter. Which you are implying here.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            the function is: elimination of the boring long time.
                            This is not a function. Try again.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            um zu beweisen das ich mich widerspreche müsstest du mir emotionen in meiem INNEREN nachweisen was du aber unmöglich kannst das einzige was du siehst ist das was ich nach ausen hin spiele und dir zeige wie ein schauspieler.
                            Now, it is the right time to tell you that you are imagining this. You already showed some emotions (even the fact of you ,that you are writing in German proves this fact).
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            Der supjektive betrachtungswinkel eines Forschers der das verhalten von anderen supjekten beobachtet führt niemals zu einem opjektiven erkenntnissgewinn. Und deswegen ist die verhaltensforschung die nur auf das bemerkte verhalten als quelle abzielt schwachsinn.
                            In English you would be forgiven if you wrote something wrong & spelled it, but in German (your native language), it is a shame on you (subjektive,etc...). Anyway, this not the point here.
                            Back to the argument, in science objectivity what concern the scientific research ,and it shouldn't be subjective. Therefor, this trash your points.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            und nun übersetze ich dir die pointe sogar auf englisch das auch du das verstehst: American experimental animals act like Americans they run chaotic and randomly around without sense and in the big difference the german experimental animals they act like germans They sat and pondered like Philosophers.

                            in other words: American Behaviorism believers are clueless chaotics
                            Wrong, the behavior is not dealing about a specific country or nationality. If there is a human who is dying from thirst he/she will drink a water, and not only that ,but he/she is going to give whatever he/she can for water. You can't just say, because someone is living in England he/she will drink tea instead of water. The choice here is already determined. Which also means, if water is not available any other alternative will be favored. So, again you are claiming facts based on your opinion.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            ja seltsam das ich Irrenhaus als definition anerkenne denn verrückt ist man ja nicht wenn man verrückt ist sondern solang die geselschaft das toll findet oder selbst daran erkrankt ist ist ja alles ok sondern nein verrückt ist man erst wenn man in einem irranhaus ist entweder freiwillig oder eben unfreiwillig.
                            "I am also going to repeat myself again. Mad-House is not a definition. I'll leave the reasons for your creativity and imagination to guess why". In addition, see how a definition or a meaning is defined in your dictionary.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            the need of Suicide is so important because of the Freedom of Choice es ist eben extrem wichtig das man die freie wahl hat zu leben oder eben aufgrund deines eigenen willen zu sterben.
                            No it isn't your freedom. You are hurting the economic of your country ,and even doing more damage to everyone. As, I already mentioned suiciding is sickness.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            be sure Suicide is a human "NEED" because this makes us humans! only stupid animals do not have need for suicide.
                            No, some animals commit suicide. The factor here is of illness and a deadly one, which again leads us back to suicide is not a "NEED", but a type of sickness.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            if you ask about my believing systems then i answer you: Discordianism,Chaos,Nihilism,Solipsism
                            I'll not aruge about your believing system ,and you are welcome.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            call it autism but for me your sentence without the is was just broken...
                            Your claim is hardly to be accepted. Going from a language to anther and can't skip "is". Try harder, next time.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            anyway i know that i don't have a sensitive emotionality I'm more like a bulldozer with a flamethrower burning all down.
                            You do have emotions, and every single time you prove that you do.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            Es gibt keine Realität sowie es keine Wahrheit gibt genauso-wenig gibt es eine Absolute Sache.
                            Prove it then.
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            "verwirrt" ist das einzige wort in deinem satz wo keine lüge ist. "confused" is the only word in your sentence without a lie Discordianism,Chaos,Nihilism,Solipsism are more valid than all your fake words.
                            Fake words? So they aren't words. Which means you can't understand and read them? Right?
                            Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
                            Wieso es Pseudowissenschaftlich ist ist simpel weil die Verhaltensforschung davon ausgeht das der Beobachter Blickwinkel das Ergebnis nicht beeinflusst meine studie aber ging exakt um diesen Blickwinkel du bekommst andere Resultate wenn du einen anderen Blickwinkel einforderst in deinen untersuchungsmetoden.
                            Scroll up to read my respond on this matter, or any of my previous reply's.
                            [QUOTE=Qaridarium;253564]Seltsam du akzeptierst also den englischen Artikel in der Wikipedia wo es darum geht was der doppelte standart bedeutet du ignorierst aber den Wikipedia Artikel wo das Doppelleben erläutert wird und das nur weil er auf deutsch ist und du nichts verstehst ?...]
                            You still didn't define the requested terms clearly, in the way they should.


                            More over, Let put this into a way you can understand.
                            I am not from German ,and it is not even my 1st language, neither 2nd and off course not the 3rd one. Which means ,I don't speak German. If you are going to write in German rather than English, I will literally ignore it.

                            In addition to that ,and as I already mentioned in my 1st post (hobby/free time, part). I'm letting you know, that this week is a busy week for me. So, it will take me a while to respond back to you, so you might expect a reply in the weekend.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                              More over, Let put this into a way you can understand.
                              I am not from German ,and it is not even my 1st language, neither 2nd and off course not the 3rd one. Which means ,I don't speak German. If you are going to write in German rather than English, I will literally ignore it.
                              "I am not from Germany" or "I'm not a German" oder "Ich bin kein Deutscher" oder "Ich komme nicht aus Deutschland"
                              Thank dank to an the die keyboard tastatur we wir do tun not nicht speak sprechen at all überhaubt nicht we wir do write schreiben.
                              Anyway wie auch immer you should du solltest not write wrong nicht falsch schreiben wenn if you write to me wenn du mit mir schreibst because weil its really es wirklich bad schlecht für mich for me.
                              Also ebenfalls you already ignorierst ignore du mich doch schon me. Ich I habe do not nicht das have gefühl the feeling that das you du mich take me ernst nimmst seriously.

                              Whatever was auch immer i will force ich werde dich zwingen you to learn german deutsch zu lernen!

                              Originally posted by eTrune View Post
                              In addition to that ,and as I already mentioned in my 1st post (hobby/free time, part). I'm letting you know, that this week is a busy week for me. So, it will take me a while to respond back to you, so you might expect a reply in the weekend.
                              Dann Then Wünsche i wish ich dir you eine a erfolgreiche successful arbeits working woche week!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X