so you have a minimal better co2-rate with atom energie then you would have with gas, that minimal amount more of co2 is no bad thing in the gain of no totaly gaus we will get each 10 years from atomic energie. In japan they are better takers, if such thing happens in france or so, you will have mass panic and nobody will live there ever. they will all run away to northern europe or someone else.
And its not proven (why is that not teached in school if its proven) that co2- is bad for the earth, its just unlogical, because plants better groth. And if thats the price we have to pay I even get a fan of this co2-collecting technologie, (as much negative points and risks that has), at least if a country use that technolegy they will mostly have to deal with the problems alone when their fields stopp growing stuff and not countries that not save money in investing into alternative energie gets doomed.
and whats the point there are claims that alternative technologie is a bit more expensive, some other say its cheaper, so ok jsut belive for a moment its a bit more epensive is that the only reason why we would use a very dangerous technologie like atomic doom reactors?