Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

custom benchmarks, linux vs server 2008

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • custom benchmarks, linux vs server 2008

    I've been working on a highly threaded, high throughput processing chain for working with large format digital imagery. The performance numbers that everyone likes to look at are the ones where input imagery is geometrically warped into an image mosaic.

    For development we've been running dual systems, one with linux, one with windows (both 64bit). The initial systems were dual clovertowns (2 sockets, 8 cores at 1.6GHz). I swapped them out for dual core i7's (2 sockets, 16 virtual cores at 2.4Ghz).

    With the c2q systems typical thoughput was within ~15-20% between linux and server 2008. So I didn't bother so much. Updating to the core i7 with hyperthreading on, a huge disparity appeared where the linux throughput is 3x higher than server 2008.

    This particular process uses 2 sets of threads in a 4 stage pipeline (1 stage input, 2 balanced stages in the middle and one stage output).

    I've run a series of benchmarks with changing the number of total processing threads. Also I took the linux hard drive, put it inside the windows core i7 box and replicated some of the same results (so hardware is *not* an issue here).

    Any comments about these results?


  • #2
    Also note the core i7 was originally running windows7 when I observed the problems.

    Comment


    • #3
      Any plans to publicly release this benchmark?
      Michael Larabel
      http://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Michael View Post
        Any plans to publicly release this benchmark?
        It's not in any releasable state and requires a significant amount of data inputs. Part of a "release" would be to plug in a full up front simulation of real data.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by bnolsen View Post
          Any comments about these results?
          Thanks for such comparison. I'm curious which kernel were you running and if were you using GNU's malloc library?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by kraftman View Post
            Thanks for such comparison. I'm curious which kernel were you running and if were you using GNU's malloc library?
            Yes, everything stock gcc-4.4.x, run test under 2.6.33.

            Comment

            Working...
            X