Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

    Phoronix: Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

    While Fedora 20 is looking to land GNOME 3.12 as a stable release upgrade, the developers normally shipping a bleeding-edge Linux graphics stack haven't sent down any stable release updates for the much-improved Mesa 10 drivers. Fortunately, there's some unofficial choices...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYxOTM

  • #2
    I'd rather have a intel driver update than a mesa update. There is a really annoying bug in the version of xorg-x11-drv-intel in f20 which is fixed in 2.9<something>

    Comment


    • #3
      Copr Repo Manamger GUI

      Fedora needs a GUI tool to add/remove coper repositories. Most repo files have the same files and such a tool will help Copr become more user friendly.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Wilfred View Post
        I'd rather have a intel driver update than a mesa update. There is a really annoying bug in the version of xorg-x11-drv-intel in f20 which is fixed in 2.9<something>
        I am sure there is more than one bug however one does need a bug report number to refer to the problem you are talking about. Would you mind providing that?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
          I am sure there is more than one bug however one does need a bug report number to refer to the problem you are talking about. Would you mind providing that?
          No problem:
          https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
          I have enabled sna, because well uxa is slow.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Wilfred View Post
            No problem:
            https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
            I have enabled sna, because well uxa is slow.
            You probably should file it in Red Hat bugzilla and add a reference to this report and request an update. The fix looks fairly targeted and the Fedora maintainer could consider backporting it.

            Comment


            • #7
              here's a New repo for what looks like 10.2 git releases for f20 http://blog.kwizart.fr/post/2014/03/...-for-Fedora-20

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
                You probably should file it in Red Hat bugzilla and add a reference to this report and request an update. The fix looks fairly targeted and the Fedora maintainer could consider backporting it.
                Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071762

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Anvil View Post
                  here's a New repo for what looks like 10.2 git releases for f20 http://blog.kwizart.fr/post/2014/03/...-for-Fedora-20
                  Tried but realized I had upgraded my llvm to 3.4, while this repo is still using llvm 3.3

                  I'm afraid it'll take a long time for fedora users to get the full benefits from upstreams.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X