I run "x11perf -all" to test the 2d performance. using "radeon" driver, the result show that the performance lower than using "fbdev" driver's . In most test cases, the performance of using "radeon" radeon is slightly less than that of using "fbdev" driver. But in some test cases, the performance of using "fbdev" driver is twice that of using "radeon" driver.
But when i run "glxgears" , the performance of using "radeon" driver is 50 times than that using "fbdev" driver.
so, is the 2d performance normal for my system ?? I need a QT project in my system , which need high 2d performance. I am dissatisfied with the 2d performance with radeon. what can i do ??
But when i run "glxgears" , the performance of using "radeon" driver is 50 times than that using "fbdev" driver.
so, is the 2d performance normal for my system ?? I need a QT project in my system , which need high 2d performance. I am dissatisfied with the 2d performance with radeon. what can i do ??
Comment