Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

why do the nativ linux clind of Heroes of Newearth not work with the radeon driver?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Kano View Post
    you are too stupid to execute my script?
    Quick answer: YES

    is a crime?

    Comment


    • #17
      hd 6770
      1600x900
      all settigs high/ultra
      38-45 fps

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Pontostroy View Post
        hd 6770
        1600x900
        all settigs high/ultra
        38-45 fps
        nice one do you use the new shader compiler? and shader caching ?
        what kind of CPU do you use?

        the hd6770 is a little bit faster than my card 640 shaders vs 800 shaders 750mhz clockspeed vs 800mhz clockspeed 0,5gb ram vs 1gb ram.
        but the different should not be so great.

        do you use the oibaf ppa or do you use hand compiled stuff ?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
          nice one do you use the new shader compiler? and shader caching ?
          what kind of CPU do you use?

          the hd6770 is a little bit faster than my card 640 shaders vs 800 shaders 750mhz clockspeed vs 800mhz clockspeed 0,5gb ram vs 1gb ram.
          but the different should not be so great.

          do you use the oibaf ppa or do you use hand compiled stuff ?
          pentium g620
          opensuse + my repo with git mesa, kernel, xf86-drivers, etc.
          Shader caching and llvm shader compiler are enabled.
          I use old( 5-6 months) non updated verson of HoN.

          Comment


          • #20
            Hi Q, you drinking too much of those Monster drinks lmao

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by DeepDayze View Post
              Hi Q, you drinking too much of those Monster drinks lmao


              my health status do not allow me to drink stuff like that.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Pontostroy View Post
                pentium g620
                opensuse + my repo with git mesa, kernel, xf86-drivers, etc.
                Shader caching and llvm shader compiler are enabled.
                I use old( 5-6 months) non updated verson of HoN.
                this is broken on hd4000 cards: "Shader caching and llvm shader compiler are enabled."

                yes maybe they fix this in the future.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Pontostroy View Post
                  pentium g620
                  opensuse + my repo with git mesa, kernel, xf86-drivers, etc.
                  Shader caching and llvm shader compiler are enabled.
                  I use old( 5-6 months) non updated verson of HoN.
                  Pontostroy, did you see much performance difference from enabling the LLVM shader compiler (not the shader cacheing) ?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                    Pontostroy, did you see much performance difference from enabling the LLVM shader compiler (not the shader cacheing) ?
                    In HoN at start position - 31-32 fps, with R600_LLVM=0 - 27 fps. (mesa without shader caching patch )
                    But all other games shows difference about 1-2% not in favor of LLVM shader compiler.
                    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...BY-R600LLVM811

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Pontostroy View Post
                      In HoN at start position - 31-32 fps, with R600_LLVM=0 - 27 fps. (mesa without shader caching patch )
                      But all other games shows difference about 1-2% not in favor of LLVM shader compiler.
                      http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...BY-R600LLVM811
                      Thanks. The PTS numbers were more in line with what I had been expecting, but it's nice to find at least one app that runs faster with LLVM.

                      Is the table below correct ?

                      - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                      - without LLVM, with shader cache : ???

                      - with LLVM, without shader cache : 31-32 fps

                      - with LLVM, with shader cache : 38-45 fps (from your earlier post)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                        Thanks. The PTS numbers were more in line with what I had been expecting, but it's nice to find at least one app that runs faster with LLVM.

                        Is the table below correct ?

                        - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                        - without LLVM, with shader cache : ???

                        - with LLVM, without shader cache : 31-32 fps

                        - with LLVM, with shader cache : 38-45 fps (from your earlier post)
                        he speaks logically your question show you don't understand i help you:

                        - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                        - without LLVM, with shader cache : 31-32 fps

                        - with LLVM, without shader cache : ??? (there is no benchmark result for this case)

                        - with LLVM, with shader cache : 38-45 fps (from your earlier post)

                        more advance explanation :

                        Question:Pontostroy, did you see much performance difference from enabling the LLVM shader compiler? (not the shader cacheing) ?
                        Logic analyses result- (FPS without LLVM )and (without shader caching)

                        answer to this part: (did you see much performance difference from enabling the LLVM shader compiler?) In HoN at start position - 31-32 fps, with R600_LLVM=0 -
                        and then the logical part for " (without shader caching)" 27 fps. (mesa without shader caching patch )
                        Last edited by Qaridarium; 06-14-2012, 07:03 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                          Thanks. The PTS numbers were more in line with what I had been expecting, but it's nice to find at least one app that runs faster with LLVM.

                          Is the table below correct ?

                          - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                          - without LLVM, with shader cache : ???

                          - with LLVM, without shader cache : 31-32 fps

                          - with LLVM, with shader cache : 38-45 fps (from your earlier post)

                          The HoN hard to benchmark, at the starting point:

                          - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                          - without LLVM, with shader cache : 32-33 fps

                          - with LLVM, without shader cache : 31-32 fps

                          - with LLVM, with shader cache : 31-32 fps

                          38-45 fps the average values in different places.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Pontostroy View Post
                            The HoN hard to benchmark, at the starting point:

                            - without LLVM, without shader cache : 27 fps

                            - without LLVM, with shader cache : 32-33 fps

                            - with LLVM, without shader cache : 31-32 fps

                            - with LLVM, with shader cache : 31-32 fps

                            38-45 fps the average values in different places.
                            now your numbers only say that LLVM is only faster without shader cache
                            and the expected fps for my card with your driver in use should be 25,6fps.

                            something is wrong in my system

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Q, are you still running at 1920x1200 vs Pontostroy's 1600x900 ? If so that's almost 1.6x the pixel count right there. Factor in 1.25x for shader differences and 1.06x for clock differences and you're at maybe a 2.1x difference, so your frame rates would be sub-15 fps if everything scaled linearly (which doesn't actually happen but it's a start).

                              Maybe match resolution then match HON version as a next step ?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Also note, as I mentioned in another thread, that the llvm backend doesn't support indirect addressing yet. If the shader uses indirect addressing, the driver will use the non-llvm backend. A lot of games use indirect addressing.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X